Environment correspondent Sandi Keane provides detailed up-to-date analysis on the Fukushima nuclear disaster, including an exclusive interview with Dr Helen Caldicott. Experts raise the grim possibility of nuclear explosion at the disintegrating plant.
As the true horror of the Fukushima disaster continues to generate a sense of ill-boding, more and more of our friends in Japan, desperate for the truth, are turning to Independent Australia. At Independent Australia, we believe we are short-changed by the mass media. Our credo is to seek out the truth with old-fashioned, dogged, investigative journalism. Starting with David Donovan’s first interview with Dr Helen Caldicott on 15 March, just days after the earthquake and tsunami, we have continued to drill down beyond the soothing words of the Japanese government and the nuclear industry to expose the truth.
One of the reasons Independent Australia has been ahead of the pack on the Fukushima disaster is its regular interviews with Dr Helen Caldicott, whose astute observations from her own sources are often echoed weeks later by the mainstream media (mostly outside Australia). In the interests of those searching for responsible reporting on Fukushima, especially our friends in Japan, we bring you another exclusive interview with Dr Caldicott, who has devoted most of her life to exposing the dangers of the failed nuclear experiment.
THE REASSURING OFFICIAL NUCLEAR LINE ON FUKUSHIMA
In our search for credible sources of news, we start with the Japanese government. Trust them, they’re from the government! Dr Ziggy Switkowski urges us. In his latest article in The Australian last week, he reassures us that the government is in control of the disaster:
“…the nuclear network performed with amazing resilience, reaffirming confidence in the technology when it’s deployed in more benign geologies”.
And if that doesn’t allay your fears, the advice from the World Nuclear Association is the equivalent of a valium overdose. On the same day that David Donovan posted an update in Independent Australia with Dr Caldicott entitled: ‘Fukushima Meltdown – Caldicott says Japan may become uninhabitable – Media Silent’, John Ritch, Director General of the World Nuclear Association was calling responses to the disaster such as that from Germany as “irrational”.
In his opinion, unbelievably, the extent of the nuclear disaster was just a bit of flooding of a few diesel generators on the east coast of Japan! Here’s the excerpt from an interview in Petroleum Economics, entitled Germany’s Lonely Exit, by Kwok W Wan, 31 May, 2011:
“This irrational action (Germany’s exit from nuclear power) can only be explained by the quirks of German parliamentary politics. It makes no sense for the flooding of a few diesel generators on the east coast of Japan to result in the restructuring of the entire German industrial system.”
Are we all on the same planet? This is not Chicken Little vs. brain dead spin, as I believe some of our readers have accused us of. Where does the truth lie? And do we even have a right to know? Working closely with both the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) and the nation’s mainstream media outlets, the Kan administration in Japan maintains the nuclear meltdown situation is largely mitigated and under control. But the independent media is now seeking its own answers from independent scientists, who are in turn picked up by the general media in Japan — sparking a crackdown on those who dare stray from the official line.
JAPANESE POLITICIAN BLOWS WHISTLE ON GOVERNMENT COVER-UP
The Wall Street Journal has come up trumps in shattering any illusion that veteran anti-nuclear campaigners like Dr Caldicott are over-egging the disaster. The WSJ is high profile, just like Ichiro Osawa. Known as Japan’s “Shadow Shogun”, Osawa is no Chicken Little. He was a major reforming force in Japanese politics as president of Japan’s main opposition party, the Democratic Party of Japan, from 2006 until May 2009. In an interview with Osawa on May 26, 2011, Osawa echoes Dr Caldicott’s fears that Japan may indeed become uninhabitable.
“Some day we may not be able to live in Japan. There is the possibility that the power plant can reach the state of criticality again. If it explodes, it’s a huge matter. Radiation is being leaked in order to keep the reactors from exploding. So, in this sense, it’s even worse than letting the power plant explode. Radiation is going to be flowing out for a long period of time.
“This is not a matter of money, but of life and death for the Japanese. If Japan cannot be saved, then the people of Japan are done for. We can always print money. Ultimately the people will have to bear the burden.”
Osawa calls on the Japanese Government to do more:
“It’s been two months, actually 70 days, but the situation at the nuclear reactors is still out of control.
“Government must be determined to put a stop to radioactive pollution no matter what it takes, money or otherwise.”
Osawa slams the Kan administration for putting together a team made up exclusively of people who depend on nuclear power to make a living, referred to as “members of the nuclear mafia”.
“Did you see all those scholars saying “the crisis is not so terrible,” “won’t harm the health at all” on TV? What they say is meaningless because they depend on nuclear power for their livelihood.”
“..the government doesn’t tell the truth…”
[Click here to see Ochiro Ozawa speak about the challenges facing Japan on the Wall Street Journal website.]
The Japanese politician makes plain what IA has been saying now for two months — there is an official cover-up going on about the full extent of the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
Reading this chilling account of the deception being played out in Japan, I kept thinking of Ziggy Switkowski’s comment in his aforementioned article in The Australian:
“…no technology ticks as many mandatory boxes as nuclear power.”
What kind of boxes, I wonder, Dr Switkowski? Coffins?
Dr Caldicott agrees with Ichiro Osawa about there being a cover-up in Japan and explains the reasons why — big business and big money.
“It is exactly what I’ve been saying for over a month. Very few people are speaking the truth. There is a huge cover-up going in Japan.
“Japan has heavily invested in producing nuclear reactors all over the world. Mitsubishi, Toshiba, TEPCO. That puts their cover up into context. These massive firms obviously don’t want to lose their investment and export trade. That’s why they’ve been obfuscating the data about the accident and lying to the people and the world and inadequately measuring radiation all over Japan.
Dr Caldicott says the Japanese actively hindered international assistance:
“Also they prevented and delayed foreign experts and organisations coming in to help and to monitor the situation. The IAEA and the World Health Organisation should have been there from the start. Not that there is much anyone can do.
“It’s like a surgeon accidently cutting the aorta and there’s nothing you can do except watch the patient bleed to death before your very eyes.
The Japanese Government has been negligent in not informing the Japanese people about the true state of affairs, continues Dr Caldicott:
“Then I read that government officials don’t want to tell people the truth because that’ll create panic. From a medical perspective, we are obliged to get informed consent from our patient; in other words, we must tell them the truth. If that makes them frightened, they have to deal with that — the truth. So, the Government is morally obliged to tell the people of Japan and the world the truth.”
THE FRIGHTENING REALITY OF FUKUSHIMA
Every day, new facts emerge — each more sobering and scary than the last. In early April, the International Atomic Energy Agency had told us that 370,000 terabecquerels escaped from the facility. We are now told to double that figure to 770,000 terabecquerels. One terabecquerel is a trillion becquerels, the standard measure of radiation. The permissible level of iodine-131 for vegetables and fish is 2,000 becquerels per kilogram. What will they tell us tomorrow? I’m not sure, but maybe we are getting the lobster slow boil treatment. Perhaps they think it’s better if we don’t know or don’t notice.
The indigestible chunks of information we do get are confusing for non-scientists. How do we make sense of them and their implications for Japan or the rest of the world? Dr Caldicott advised me to subscribe to Arnie Gundersen’s regular reports, which are short and relatively simple. Arnie Gundersen of Fairewinds Associates has over thirty-nine years of nuclear industry experience and oversight and is a frequent expert witness on nuclear safety matters to the US Federal Government and private industry. He also co-wrote the government’s nuclear reactor de-commissioning handbook.
Like Dr Caldicott, Gundersen believes Fukushima is worse than Chernobyl and is staunchly standing by this claim.
Arnie Gundersen was recently interviewed by Chris Martenson. Gundersen confirmed Caldicott’s earlier interview with me that radioactive water is running out the bottom of the reactors and through cracks in the containment, directly touching uranium, plutonium, cesium and strontium, and then carrying all those radioactive isotopes as liquids and gases out into the environment.
Dr. Caldicott agrees:
“Massive releases of radiation are ongoing every single day into the air and the water from the Fukushima site. And there is no evidence when or if it will ever be stopped. Also, they are now finding curium 244 around the reactors, which is many times more dangerous than plutonium by orders of magnitude as well as the deadly plutonium. Many such dangerous isotopes are being released with impunity.
“As Arnie Gunderson said yesterday, this accident is equivalent to 20 radioactive cores melting. And the three cores in units 1, 2 and 3 have actually melted through their containment vessels, not just melted down. This is called a melt-through by the industry.”
“Unprecedented! An absolute total disaster of biblical proportions,” Caldicott concludes.
I asked her about Gundersen’s concern about the impact of the saltwater on Unit 3 because of its effect on iron. He has said that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is afraid that the reactor bottom will literally just break right out and dump everything because of corrosion. Then, the entire core could fall out suddenly and a “steam explosion” could occur – or in other words, a violent hydrogen explosion – although he concedes that this may be only a one in a hundred chance.
Dr. Caldicott is, likewise, concerned about the possibility of another explosion – either steam or hydrogen – and/or another major earthquake, which would release huge amounts of radiation, much more than has already occurred.
“Building No. 4 [which is leaning at an angle about to topple], containing a damaged fuel pool with highly radioactive material, could collapse or the melted larval radioactive cores of units 1, 2 or 3 could hit the concrete floor of the containment building having melted though the reactor vessel, where the molten core would react with the concrete floor to produce a hydrogen explosion, or hit huge amounts of water causing a massive steam explosion. These three events separately would release huge amounts of radiation, like Chernobyl.”
POSSIBILITY OF NUCLEAR EXPLOSION
Dr Caldicott then discussed the possibility of a full nuclear explosion:
“Talking recently to Dr Ian Fairlie a radio-biologist in London, on top of all this, he made the point that it is not out of the realm of possibility there could be an actual nuclear explosion. In that context, he said that unit 1 is still experiencing intermittent periods of criticality.
”That means there are pockets within the molten core where fissioning is happening.
“We can assess this situation because of the release of certain isotopes with very short half-lives that indicate active fissioning. Fissioning of uranium atoms takes place within a nuclear reactor — a large flux of neutrons induces the splitting of heavy uranium atoms which then release the most massive amounts of energy, e=mc2. The resultant heat then boils the water, which creates steam, which drives a turbine generating electricity.
“It is virtually the same process as blowing up a bomb, but it is a controlled criticality. It is this fissioning process that produces heat in a reactor and the explosion in an atomic bomb”
So we now have a nuclear engineer, a high profile politician, a radio-biologist and a nuclear-savvy physician warning of a possible nuclear explosion from unit 1. Ichiro Osawa is right. The Japanese government needs to do whatever it takes to stop the plant from exploding. You can always print more money but we each have only one life.
It is clear we are in unchartered territory, as has been the case with all previous nuclear disasters since we discovered how to split the atom. Who can forget Einstein’s grim prediction:
“The unleashed power of the atom has changed everything save our modes of thinking and we thus drift toward unparalleled catastrophe…”
We are all complicit through our own ignorance and laissez faire attitude in allowing the nuclear industry and governments around the world to build nuclear reactors that:
- cannot be guaranteed to withstand the forces of nature;
- cannot be decommissioned because no government is willing to spend their budget; and
- whose nuclear waste cannot safely be disposed of.
THE HEALTH DANGERS
In my interview with Dr. Caldicott on May 13, she made the point that, so far, the rest of Japan had been lucky as the wind was blowing from the west. The plume of radiated cloud was blowing out to sea (to the not so lucky residents of the west coast of USA). Caldicott predicted that the wind would change and seasonal rains would come. This would prove disastrous for cities like Tokyo, south of Fukushima.
The wind change was confirmed by Arnie Gundersen. The plume was heading south toward Tokyo. Remember, the plants are still omitting a lot of radiation mainly cesium and strontium. The issue, according to Gundersen, is not the total radiation you might measure with a Geiger counter in your hand, but hot particles.
Hot particles are being picked up in air filters in Tokyo, showing strontium, cesium and americium.
Gundersen is advising people in Tokyo to take their shoes off at the door and use wet dusters to dust the house. Contamination inside houses is higher now than outside because it has been tracked in over the past couple of months. He is also urging friends there to buy HEPA (high efficiency particulate air) filters and change the filters in their air-conditioning frequently. Likewise the filters in the car.
I asked Dr. Caldicott about Gundersen’s advice for residents living in Tokyo.
“If I lived in Tokyo, I would leave if I had children or was a young woman who wanted to become pregnant. It is medically contra-indicated for people to live there. Fetuses and children are extraordinarily sensitive to the carcinogenic effects of radiation.
The Wall Street Journal also reported this week on the highly toxic levels of strontium detected in seawater and groundwater at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear complex. The Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 isotopes are believed to have been released from the damaged reactors. Environmental experts fear the risk of contamination entering the food chain, a risk increased by the arrival of the wet season (again, as predicted by Dr. Caldicott in her interview with me of May 13).
According to Gundersen, the contamination to worry about in cow’s milk is iodine. This has an 8 day half-life. But he’s worried that iodine is still being found 3 months out which could be the “re-criticality” that he, Caldicott, Osawa and Fairlie mentioned earlier. So, he is advising friends to avoid milk and dairy products for the time being. Washing vegetables is a no-brainer, says Gundersen. Caldicott disagrees, as it only gets rid of external radiation. Best to avoid fish caught in the Pacific as well.
One of the high profile casualties from the hotspot phenomenon has been the green tea crop in Kanagawa and neighboring Shizuoka where cesium was found at a level that exceeded the government’s legal limit by as much as 35%. Shizuoka represents 40% of Japanese green tea exports.
Gundersen has concerns about radiation in the US. The US Food and Drug Administration is not monitoring fish entering the US. One day, a tuna might set off a radiation alarm. People could think it was a dirty bomb. It hasn’t happened yet because the tuna haven’t migrated across the Pacific. But he thinks that by 2013 you might see contamination of the water and in those fish at the top of the food chain.
Air contamination has now also reached Europe. CRIIRAD (the Commission for Independent Research and Information on Radioactivity in English) is the French research authority on radioactivity; whilst it declares that radioactive air contamination is 10 times worse in the USA, it is warning Europeans – particularly pregnant or nursing mothers and children – to:
“avoid the regular consumption of rain water and excessive consumption of vulnerable foods such as leaf vegetables, fresh milk and ricotta /cream cheese)”
And in our direction? Hawaiian farmers have started feeding goats and cows with sodium boron to reduce radiation in milk. It seems we are all at the whim of the winds.
AUSTRALIA’S ROLE IN THE FUKUSHIMA DISASTER
And what of Australia’s role in this global catastrophe? No meaningful dialogue about the morality of the nuclear experiment can occur without questioning our export of uranium, which, no doubt, ended up at Fukushima.
We may be one of the world’s biggest exporters, but did you know that we earned more selling cheese in 2010 than uranium? Check it out with the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Perhaps uranium will catch up with cheese, but why would we take the risk on another disaster like we’ve seen in Japan, just to improve the profit margins of multinational mining companies?
Generations to come will wonder at the greed and stupidity of their forebears. Mine it, build it, make the money and run is the credo of our generation. Leave the problems to future generations who will foot the bill — if they and the planet survive.
Here’s the uranium industry’s plan:
Mine the uranium, sell the uranium, repeat until rich
(Apologies to Dr. Guy Pearse.)
Huge pressure is currently being brought to bear on Australia to become the world’s nuclear waste dump. The view of some is that those at the front end of the cycle – like Australia and Canada, who mine much of the world’s uranium – should take responsibility also for the back end — the non-disposable toxic nuclear waste. Our friend, John Ritch – who we met earlier and who believes that the Fukushima disaster is simply a lot of fuss over the flooding of a few diesel generators – is one who is pushing for Australia to take the world’s waste.
Dr Caldicott clearly despairs of our straying off the moral path:
“We are so morally bereft, it’s beyond my imagination. My country is not discussing the fact that much of the uranium in those reactors is probably Australian uranium which is now polluting much of Japan and indeed a large swath of the northern hemisphere — inevitably over time inducing millions of cancers and genetic disease.
“Martin Ferguson is running around saying we must sell uranium like there’s no tomorrow – and there may not be a tomorrow. What has happened to the moral base of Australia? We used to be so adamant about moral issues. Have we totally lost our moral compass”
Caldicott fears Muckaty Station in the NT, currently proposed by the government for a nuclear waste dump, will become the
“…dark underbelly of the nuclear industry…out of sight, out of mind. After all it is only Aboriginal land! It probably sits over a tributary of the Great Artesian Basin, but who cares?”
Halliburton built the railway link between Alice Springs and Darwin and the railway line is managed by Serco, a UK nuclear waste disposal and transport expert. There is little traffic on the line so, according to Caldicott:
“…it is sitting there for future nefarious use!”
For the full expose on the nuclear waste fantasy proposed by Coalition government (and possibly the current Gillard government), follow the link here.
[Sign up for the free weekly Independent Australia newsletter by clicking here. You can also follow IA on Facebook and Twitter.]
Caldicott reminds us we were once better served by our world leaders:
“President Jefferson once said: “an informed democracy will behave in a responsible fashion”.
“This Australian democracy is totally uninformed about all things nuclear – a situation, which is the antithesis of the past when Australia led the movement against French nuclear testing, when the unions banned uranium mining for 5 years and when we were at the forefront of pushing nuclear disarmament in the 80s.
“Australia is morally reprehensible and it’s time we got on the right track. It’s time we invested in renewable energy – bathed as we are by sun and blown by wind – and led the world to become the energy superpower of the planet.”
Meanwhile, the units at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant are still leaking and emitting radioactive gasses. According to Gundersen, you can see the steam on a cold day. He believes it will take a year or so before this radioactive material cools down and stops boiling. Until then, he says, the units will continue to crank out their deadly steam and radioactive liquids.
This month, the operator of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant will begin to cover the No.1 reactor building with polyester sheets to try to prevent the dispersal of radioactive substances.
No-one has any idea whether this might be the beginning of the end — or just the beginning…









9 Comments
Experts raise fears of actual #nuclear explosion at #Fukushima. #Tepco #Japan http://fb.me/Are3ksy8
Experts raise fears of actual #nuclear explosion at #Fukushima. #Tepco #Japan http://fb.me/Are3ksy8
RT @independentaus: Experts raise fears of actual #nuclear explosion at #Fukushima. #Tepco #Japan http://be.rtgit.com/jDtoDQ
This is from an article that I found in late March 2011, about nuclear Gypsies. The original article from 2010 seems to have dissapeared since, but appears in blogs now..(originally from the New Internationalists ‘World Guide’):
More than 70,000 people are working in the 17 nuclear power plants and 52 reactors scattered across Japan. Although the nuclear power stations have their own employees in technical positions, more than 80 percent of the non-technical staff is composed of untrained workers who accept short-term contracts. Homeless people are recruited to preform the most dangerous tasks such as cleaning reactors and decontaminating facilities. The ‘Yakuza’ (Japanese Mafia) finds, selects and illegally hires the homeless workers for companies which are totally reliant on this workforce to keep their operations going. The most probable fate for these hidden workers is death from bone cancer, caused by the amounts of radioactivity in their bodies, which are higher than those allowed in most countries.
They are called ‘nuclear gypsies’ on account of the nomadic life they lead, going from one power station to another until they become ill and then die. To hire these rootless poor people is only possible through the connivance of the Government. The Japanese authorities have stipulated that the annual amount of radioactivity a person can be exposed to is 50 mSv (milli-sieverts). However, the European Union (EU) set 100 mSv as the maximum dosage a worker in a nuclear reactor can be exposed to in five years, while 1 mSv is the annual amount allowed for the general public. According to a report in June 2003 in the Spanish newspaper ‘el Mundo’, the ‘Companies operating nuclear stations hire homeless people until they have been exposed to the maximum radiation levels and then they fire them “for the sake of their health”, sending them onto the street again’. Then, within days or months, those same workers are hired again under different names.
MAFIA MOBS
‘The yakuza (mafia) acts as an intermediary. Companies pay 30,000 yen (216 euros) per working day, but the hired worker only gets 20,000 yen (144 euros). The yakuza get to keep the difference’ says Kenji Higuchi, a Japanese journalist who has been investigating this issue for 30 years. Every week, together with Yukoo Fujita, a professor at Keio University, Higuchi visits places where homeless people hang out, to talk to them and warn them about the risks they run by accepting illegal jobs at nuclear power plants, where they are subjected to unhealthy temperature and oxygen conditions, in addition to being exposed to inadmissible levels of radiation. The daily rate of pay for working at power plants – work that is commonly done by robots in other countries – is approximately twice the amount paid in the construction industry. Thee recruitment of homeless people for such work has been carried out in Japan since the 1970′s. According to Fujita, at least half of the 5,000 temporary workers employed by nuclear plants are homeless people.
U to 12 per 10,000 workers in the power plants have a 100 percent chance of dying from cancer, and a larger number have a ‘high likelihood’. It is estimated that over the last 30 years more than 300,000 temporary staff have been recruited into the Japanese nuclear plants.
GENERATING WORK FOR HOMELESS PEOPLES
Panasonic, Toshiba and Hitachi are among the transnational companies that subcontract homeless people, The soaring demand for electricity in high-tech Japan with its 127.6 million people has fuelled the need for nuclear energy. While the Japanese active working population is around 62 million people, the present unemployment rate is 5 percent, equivalent to 3.5 million people out of work. The resultant poverty leads to homelessness and people desperate for work-at any cost.
Japan’s drive to build nuclear power plants began in earnest after the Energy Crisis in the early 1970s. … Two were under construction and an additional nine are to be built by 2010. …. as day laborers by gangs that have connections with the yakuza. … The workers are sometimes called “nuclear gypsies. …
factsanddetails.com › Japan › 03Energy… – Cached – Similar
2. deviantART: Leekduck’s Journal: Radioactive Homeless People
19 Dec 2010 … They are called ‘nuclear gypsies’ on account of the nomadic life they lead, … ‘The yakuza (mafia) acts as an intermediary. … twice the amount paid in the construction industry. … According to Fujita, at least half of the 5000 temporary workers employed by nuclear plants are homeless people. …
leekduck.deviantart.com/journal/37019161/ – Cached
3. Japan’s Nuclear Energy and the Supermoon | Leaves in the Attic
“Laborers who work at nuclear plants are often homeless people, … as day laborers by gangs that have connections with the yakuza. … The workers are sometimes called “nuclear gypsies. … So putting it mildly, these doomsday prophecies are not doom and gloom, but a glimmer of hope to clean up our act literally. …
lieuxabandonnes.blogspot.com/…/japans-nuclear-energy-and-supermoon. html
Get more results from the past 24 hours
4. Leaves in the Attic
The workers are sometimes called “nuclear gypsies.” One of these workers told the Los … are not doom and gloom, but a glimmer of hope to clean up our act literally. … When North Korea was asked to close down its nuclear reprocessing plant it … as day laborers by gangs that have connections with the yakuza. …
lieuxabandonnes.blogspot.com/
Get more results from the past 24 hours
5. Nuclear Power Plant Gypsies In High Tech Society – Research and …
by Y Tanaka – 1986 – Cited by 1 – Related articles
under construction, seven are planned, and another gigantic complex known as the Mutsu Ogawara Development, …. working for a Yakuza group in Tsuruga were arrested after …. of radiation, and that in such cases they act as substitutes for … Gempatsu Jipushii (Nuclear Power Plant Gypsies) (Tokyo: Gendai Shokan, …
http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst?docId=97788968
by Paul Jobin, Japan Focus
While the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) experiences difficulties in recruiting workers willing to go to Fukushima to clean up the damaged reactors, the WHO is planning to conduct an epidemiological survey on the catastrophe. This is the first of two reports by Paul Jobin offering a worker-centered analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
Liquidators recruited by ads
In the titanic struggle to bring to closure the dangerous situation at Fukushima Nuclear Plant No1, there are many signs that TEPCO is facing great difficulties in finding workers. At present, there are nearly 700 people at the site. As in ordinary times, workers rotate so as to limit the cumulative dose of radiation inherent in maintenance and cleanup work at the nuclear site. But this time, the risks are greater, and the method of recruitment unusual.
Job offers come not from TEPCO but from Mizukami Kogyo, a company whose business is construction and cleaning maintenance. The description indicates only that the work is at a nuclear plant in Fukushima Prefecture. The job is specified as 3 hours per day at an hourly wage of 10,000 yen. There is no information about danger, only the suggestion to ask the employer for further details on food, lodging, transportation and insurance.
The life of contract workers at nuclear plants
Those who answer these offers may have little awareness of the dangers and they are likely to have few other job opportunities. $122 an hour is hardly a king’s ransom given the risk of cancer from high radiation levels. But TEPCO and NISA keep diffusing their usual propaganda to minimize the radiation risks.
Rumor has it that many of the cleanup workers are burakumin. This cannot be verified, but it would be congruent with the logic of the nuclear industry and the difficult job situation of day laborers. Because of ostracism, some burakumin are also involved with yakuza. Therefore, it would not be surprising that yakuza-burakumin recruit other burakumin to go to Fukushima. Yakuza are active in recruiting day laborers of the yoseba: Sanya in Tokyo, Kotobukicho in Yokohama, and Kamagasaki in Osaka. People who live in precarious conditions are then exposed to high levels of radiation, doing the most dirty and dangerous jobs in the nuclear plants, then are sent back to the yoseba. Those who fall ill will not even appear in the statistics.1
Fukushima workers before the catastrophe
According to data published by the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Industry (NISA), in 2009, there were 1108 regular employees (seisha’in 正社員) at Fukushima NP1. These were TEPCO employees, but may also include some employees from General Electric or Toshiba, Hitachi and Mitsubishi. But the vast majority of those working at Fukushima 1 were 9195 contract laborers (hiseisha’in 非正社員). These contract employees or temporary workers were provided by subcontracting companies: they range from rank and file workers who carry out the dirtiest and most dangerous tasks—the nuclear gypsies described in Horie Kunio’s 1979 book and Higuchi Kenji’s photographic reports—to highly qualified technicians who supervise maintenance operations. So even within this category, there is much discrepancy in working conditions, wages and welfare depending on position in the hierarchy of subcontracted tasks. What is clear is that the contract laborers are routinely exposed to the highest level of radiation: in 2009 according to NISA, of those who received a dose between 5 and 10 millisieverts (mSv), there were 671 contract laborers against 36 regular employees. Those who received between 10 and 15 mSv were comprised of 220 contract laborers and 2 regular workers, while 35 contract workers and no regular workers were exposed to a dose between 15 and 20 mSv.
Since contract laborers move from one nuclear plant to another, depending on the maintenance schedule of the various reactors, they lack access to their individual cumulative dose for one year or for many years. NISA compiles only the cumulative dose for each nuclear plant. The result is that the whole system is opaque, thus complicating the procedure for workers who need to apply for occupational hazards compensation.
… And after
On March 14th, the Ministry of Health and Labor raised the maximum dose for workers to 250 mSv a year, where previously it was set at 100 mSv over 5 years (either 20 mSv a year for five years or 50 mSv for 2 years, which is in itself a strange interpretation of the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection’s guideline stipulating a maximum of 20 mSv a year. The letter that the Ministry sent the next day to the chiefs of Labor Bureaus (都道府県労働局) to inform them of the decision justifies it on the grounds of the state of emergency (やむを得ない緊急の場合), ignoring the safety of the workers.2 This could be a measure to avoid or limit the number of workers who would apply for compensation. Stated differently, it has the effect of legalizing illness and deaths from nuclear radiation, or at least the state’s responsibility for them. Usually, in case of leukemia, a one year exposure to 5 mSV is sufficient to obtain occupational hazards compensation. The list of potential applicants could be very long in light of the number of workers already on the job, or who are likely to be recruited to dismantle the reactors. The project proposed by Toshiba to close down and safeguard the reactors would take at least 10 years.3 In short, the state’s concern appears to be less the health of employees and more the cost of caring for nuclear victims. The same logic prevailed when, on April 23, the government urged children back to the schools of Fukushima prefecture, stating that the risk of 20 mSv or more per year was acceptable, despite the high vulnerability of children. Can the state be prioritizing the limitation of the burden of compensation for TEPCO and protection of the nuclear industry at large over the health of workers and children?4
Why subcontracting?
As early as the mid-1970s, the use of subcontracting labor in the nuclear industry was well established in Japan. In France, this trend would develop after 1988, reaching a rate of 80% by 1992. According to NISA’s data, in 2009, Japan’s nuclear industry recruited more than 80,000 contract workers against 10,000 regular employees. The initial goal was not necessarily to hide the collective dose, but to limit labor costs. But the fact is that whether in France or Japan, the nuclear industry nurtures a heavy culture of secrecy concerning the number of irradiated workers. As far as we can know, based on the figures published by the Ministry of Health and Labor, before Fukushima’s catastrophe, only 9 former workers received compensation for an occupational cancer linked to their intervention in nuclear plants.5 This number is probably very far from the reality of the victims, given the number of workers exposed, and the numerous opacities of that system beginning with the fact that TEPCO and other electric power companies have always refused to disclose the list of their subcontractors.
What is the objective of epidemiological surveys?
An epidemiological survey published in March, just before the catastrophe, was based on a huge cohort of 212,000 persons recorded between 1990 and 1999, out of the total of 277,000 who had worked in nuclear plants. The survey found a significant mortality ratio for only one type of leukemia and judged that other forms of cancer among this population could not be attributed to their exposure to radiation at nuclear plants. One problem is that the survey only calculates mortality ratios, ignoring people who might have cancer but are still alive at the time of the survey. Such obvious methodological bias is frequent in this sort of surveys. In France and other countries, another bias is the tendency to ignore contract workers, though they receive the highest cumulative radioactive doses. Therefore, it is difficult to resist the conclusion that the very goal of these epidemiological surveys is to minimize the risks of nuclear radiation and encourage the nuclear industry’s business as usual.
The same logic has prevailed at WHO and IAEA in their evaluation of Chernobyl’s legacy. Compared to a mere 4000 in the “definitive” United Nations report published in 2005,6 the report published in November 2009 by the New York Academy of Sciences (based on more than 5,000 articles translated from Bielorussian, Ukrainian and Russian) evaluated the total number of victims 985,000.7 Of the 830,000 liquidators mobilized at Chernobyl, the NYAS report estimated that at least 112,000 had already died, compared to some 50 in the UN report. While the conclusions of the two reports remain contested, even Nakajima Hiroshi, the former WHO director, has acknowledged that the control of WHO by IAEA on nuclear issues was problematic. Therefore we can anticipate that the survey WHO is planning to conduct on Fukushima may provide the same anodyne conclusions.
Paul Jobin, Taipei, April 27
This article draws on previous interviews with Philippe Pons, Tokyo correspondent for Le Monde, and Pierre-André Sieber for La liberté (Switzerland). Original articles: 1, 2.
“To Work at Fukushima, You Have to Be Ready to Die”
Anne Roy interviews Paul Jobin
Interview: Specialist on Japan, the sociologist Paul Jobin has studied workplace conditions for workers in the nuclear industry. He offers us his analysis at a moment when those workers are attempting to get a hold on the situation at the Japanese power plant heavily damaged by the earthquake.
We read that they are sleeping on the hard soil, that they have only two meals per day, and are rationed in drinking water. The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) and its subcontractors allow little information to filter out concerning workers fighting on the front lines at the Fukushima power plant, a plant devastated by the earthquake and tsunami of 11 March. Paul Jobin knows these places well. In 2002, while doing research on sub-contractors in the nuclear industry, he interviewed managers and temporary workers in that plant. He analyzes the current situation in the light of this experience.
The Interview
What is known about the workers who currently work at the plant in Fukushima?
Paul Jobin: It’s a paradoxical situation. There has never been so much said about nuclear issues in Japan, but information remains scarce about those who are at the heart of the volcano, in central Fukushima. Up until ten days ago, we saw no people except the helicopter pilots who dropped the seawater, and now the soldiers of the national defense forces and firefighters, using firemen’s lamps. We had to wait until Friday March 25 to see the first photos of workers in full protective suits, these being worn inside the plant, where you could see the general state of disrepair, even in computer and control rooms, barely lit … That day, three sub-contractors were taken to the hospital because they were seriously irradiated. That was the first time we heard officially about subcontractors. But when you know how a plant like that functions under normal circumstances, one can only assume that they comprised 90% of workers on site. They are the ones who do the maintenance work, and who receive the collective dose of radiation – these are the official figures.
But then there are different types of sub-contractors: at the very bottom of the pyramid there are, for example, temporary workers who use mops to clean the reactors, or who deal with used protective clothing. They receive the strongest doses. Then come the technicians (plumbers, electricians) who inspect facilities, piping and pumps, and at the very top, there are the technicians, managers and engineers of TEPCO, who enjoy higher wages and better protection. A number of temporary workers must be on-site, but for now, we do not really know who does what. What is certain is that all those who have worked so far have had to take large doses of radioactivity.
Today, how many employees are there on the site?
Paul Jobin: Ten days ago, there were four teams of fifty, or two hundred workers. According to the most recent information, there would be six hundred. This figure might include fire fighters and soldiers, but this remains unclear. In a week, how many will there be? TEPCO had to mobilize its network of subcontractors for emergency recruiting in the region or even beyond.
According to the ads that circulate on SMS, and which are relayed on Twitter, wages offered are around 10,000 yen per day (84 euros), which is about double the average salary for a young temporary employee, but does not represent an exceptional offer either. This would mean that, despite the sacrifice of those who agree to go there, TEPCO continues to skimp on wages. Last week, the Tokyo Shimbun published testimonies of people who refused to come to work at the plant.
A man of twenty-seven had received an SMS offering a good salary, but since he has a little boy of three and a wife of twenty-six, he did not want to leave them, imagining that he would face a high risk of premature death. Also a man 48 years of age testified. He lived 40 kilometers from the plant, and had been called by someone saying: “We are looking for people over fifty who could intervene in the reactor; the pay is much higher than usual.”
You won’t come? The wording “over fifty” suggests that in order to come work on the site, you must be ready to die … Elsewhere, I read that there are locals who are willing to do the maximum because they do not want to see everything lost for thirty years, or for a thousand years, to come. Finally, Saturday, April 2, the Mainichi newspaper published an interview with an employee of TEPCO who describes the extreme difficulty of the conditions for intervention and the patched-together systems they are compelled to use to protect themselves, like wrapping themselves in plastic bags, for lack of appropriate protective suits.
Only the bosses are furnished with dosimeters. According to another worker present on that day, Friday the 11th, many simply went home carrying their dosimeter. TEPCO confirms that, due to the tsunami, a large number of dosimeters were damaged. Out of 5000, there remain no more than 320. The manufacturer has virtually no more stock, and Toshiba has sent them only 50.
They speak about a worker who was irradiated when he was working on the site while wearing small rubber boots. How do the employees protect themselves on the site?
Paul Jobin: This is true. It sounds totally inadequate, but how to do otherwise? Even in normal times, in this part of the reactor, you have to move very quickly to receive the smallest dose possible. That you can’t do with lead soles. There exist coveralls with full masks, but these devices seem poorly designed and primitive compared to the challenge of the task.
So, in the absence of effective protection, one uses what is called “radiation protection”. In Japanese, one speaks of “management of radioactivity”. That’s exactly what it is: Manage the imposed collective dose administered to workers. The issue of radiation protection enters in direct conflict with that of plant safety, because the more a plant ages, the more it “showers,” as the Japanese workers say, the more it must be cleaned, and the more you must ask personnel to carry out repairs and maintenance. Hence the extensive use of subcontractors. What makes the situation in Japan unique is that nuclear power was developed in the 1970s, and the use of subcontracting during periodic shut-downs has been systemic ever since. This organization of work has dramatic consequences for the health of workers and plant safety; hence the repetition of anomalies and other incidents, even before considering the issue of seismic risk.
Why has the Japanese minister of health decided to raise the legal dose to be received by workers?
Paul Jobin: Since 2002, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) recommends that an annual dose for nuclear workers not exceed 20 millisieverts (mSv) per year. But even in normal times, workers receive large doses, with consequences that are systematically denied or minimized.
In Japan, legislation has endorsed the standard of 20 mSv per year for workers, stipulating that the dose can be calculated as an average over a five year period, with a maximum at a given time of 100 mSv during any two years. But as of March 19, TEPCO asked to boost the maximum dose to 150 mSv, and the Ministry of Health went further, raising it to 250 mSv — this perhaps to limit the number of possible applications for recognition of occupational disease.
On Thursday, March 31, the Nuclear Safety Agency (Nisa) announced that 21 workers had received doses above 100 mSv, but that none had exceeded 250, as if this meant they could escape without too much damage, when even the International Atomic Energy Agency believes that the situation remains “very serious” in Fukushima. And in fact, dose rates are now such (up to 1000 mSv per hour on Saturday, April 2) that intervention near the reactor seems impossible.
Have there been victims recognized as having contracted occupational diseases due to their work at the plant?
Paul Jobin: In 2002, I counted 8 cases recognized since 1991. Since then, there were few others, as far as is known, because there is a certain opacity in the system. I think for example of the case of Mr. Nagao. He had worked in Fukushima 1 and 2 between 1977 and 1982 and received a cumulative dose of 70 mSv. Starting in 1986, he began experiencing all sorts of symptoms, lost his teeth, and in 1998, doctors diagnosed multiple myeloma. In 2002, he filed an application for recognition as having an occupational disease, which he obtained, not without difficulty, with the support of an associative network. Then he filed a lawsuit against TEPCO. His complaint was dismissed in 2009 in an all-too expeditious manner: the judge did not even bother to examine the medical opinions presented by the prosecution.
You have conducted a study on the effects of mercury pollution in the sea off the coastal town of Minamata by the Chisso Petrochemical Plant. How were the victims treated in this disaster?
Paul Jobin: There is an important difference between these two disasters. In Minamata, there was no explosion, residents were not immediately aware of the danger, and fear came later. Yet by the 1920s, there was already an impact on fisheries, and fish numbers decreased (not because of mercury but because of emissions of other pollutants). From the 1940s, they saw dead cats and birds, then the first human victims in the mid-1950s. The creation of awareness of the threat took a long time. The first trial took place between 1969 and 1973 and concluded with a judgment against Chisso for a substantial sum of compensation for the plaintiffs.
Then there were many other trials, and it has been estimated that there was a total of at least 40,000 victims. Finally, in July 2009, a compensation law was passed, which was quite well received by many victims. From the first steps taken by the victims from Chisso in 1956 to 2010, it will have taken over fifty years of battle with the company and the state to see fairly complete compensation. This bodes ill for the current disaster, especially since the history of reparations for victims of Minamata disease occurred at a relatively prosperous time for Japan. Who knows now what will happen to Japan after a disaster like this? It was the third largest economy in the world, but will it remain so?
As stated by the Prime Minister, Kan Naoto, this is truly a national disaster on a scale that Japan has not faced since the end of the Second World War. This is a catastrophe for the whole country. This will make it even harder for people to get redress.
Paul Jobin is Director, French Center for Research on Contemporary China, CEFC, Taipei Office, and Associate Professor, University of Paris Diderot.
Original French article at L’Humanité: “Pour travailler à Fukushima, il faut être prêt à mourir.” Interview by Anne Roy. Translated Thursday 7 April 2011, by Henry Crapo and reviewed by Bill Scoble
Recommended citation: Paul Jobin, Dying for TEPCO? Fukushima’s Nuclear Contract Workers, The Asia-Pacific Journal Vol 9, Issue 18 No 3, May 2, 2011.
RT @admin: Fukushima http://t.co/Di6pPVG
Independent Australia is grateful to you, “B”, and you, “Chris”, for shedding some light on another dark side of TEPCO: its abuse of workers. I had wondered how TEPCO managed to get such large numbers of workers back to the plant to handle the on-going crisis. They couldn’t all want to be heroes. There are several issues here: outright discrimination, abuse of workers’ rights particularly with regard to their health, and lack of accountability by the industry. The practice of sub-contracting to avoid responsibility is immoral. This is a damning indictment of the nuclear industry in Japan.
The Kan government’s failure to remove school children from schools is such a cynical act. Radiation causes just about every type of cancer but with the lag being anywhere between 5-40 years, the Japanese government and TEPCO will gain enough leeway to distance themselves. Looks like they’re all running for cover. There’ll be little compensation, that much is for sure.
I hear rumours of a cover-up in Nebraska at the flood-besieged Fort Calhoun plant. Or is it that the US media simply isn’t interested? Who would want to trust the nuclear industry anywhere in the world? A visit to Arnie Gundersen’s Fairewinds site will cure you of any idea that the US industry is properly regulated.
I agree about the World Health Organisation. How can it carry out its duties in a frank and fearless manner if it answers to the IAEA whose loyalty must be to the atomic industry. What was the UN thinking? In my earlier interview with Dr. Caldicott on 13 May, Jan Hemmer posted a comment on this. The videos are well worth watching. Here it is again:
Jan Hemmer says: 14 May, 2011 at 2:12 am
How can TEPCO and the japanese government keep the REAL measurements secret?
They are supported by the U.N. / W.H.O. / IAEA / Atomic industry one can say…
TEPCO relies on the false and unethic science that external and internal radiation is the same,
which Dr. Caldicott always criticises.
This is the main problem:
W.H.O. has Fukushima-measurement results under wraps:
http://tekknorg.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/w-h-o-secretary-general-chan-admits-for-the-first-time-in-52-years-radiation-is-always-dangerous/
Part of the problem of secrecy about Chernobyl and Fukushima is the U.N. itself:
http://www.chernobylcongress.org/fileadmin/user_upload/pdfs/Baverstock_How_the_UN_works.pdf
I’ve met Dr. Caldicott on April 9th, 2011, in Berlin, during the IPPNW congress.
Her is my footage of her speech:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpHrBawqQtQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FW1W3ZnaSyE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zj2tkeESUeQ
She also responded to Keith Baverstock – former W.H.O. employee, who spoke about the IAEA which gags the W.H.O. when it coms to radiation, and this includes Chernobyl and Fukushima:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQZr8jbiGH0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQZr8jbiGH0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9JWgs1Dq9E (Caldicott responds)
It’s no use to gather around the border of the problem.
The core of the problem is the WHA 12-40 gag agreement between IAEA (protects atomic industry)
and W.H.O. (protects health).
I was a member of a delegation who accompanied Chernobyl children to the W.H.O. in Geneva
on April 26th 2011.
This came from Senator Scott Ludlam’s office this morning. A strong contrast to the analysis of the crisis by Ziggy Switkowski and John Ritch of the World Nuclear Association
http://scott-ludlam.greensmps.org.au/content/speech/fukushima-3-months-still-matter-public-importance
Thank you Chris for posting this very informative article.
Here is another interesting point:
The discrepancy between the Greenpeace findings (Rainbow warrior) and the press release by the Japanese Government Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
1) Greenpeace Report:
Greenpeace finds troubling seaweed contamination + lab link
Posted on May 27, 2011 by Michaël V.B.
May 13, 2011: ”Initial tests of the 22 seaweed samples collected by Greenpeace along the coast North and South of the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, and up to 65km out to sea by its flag ship Rainbow Warrior registered significantly high levels of radioactive contamination. Ten samples show levels over 10,000 Bq/kg, while the official safety limits for seaweed are 2,000 Bq/kg for Iodine-131 and 500 Bq/kg for Caesium-137.“
SOURCE: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/press/releases/Japanese-Government-must-immediately-investigate-seaweed-contamination/ (or in Dutch, here)
May 26, 2011: ”The new data shows that some seaweed contamination levels are not only 50 times higher than safety limits – far higher than our initial measurements showed – but also that the contamination is spreading over a wide area, and accumulating in sea life, rather than simply dispersing like the Japanese authorities originally claimed would happen.” SOURCE: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/nuclear-reaction/marine-life-soaking-up-radiation-along-fukush/blog/34979
I relayed Greenpeace’s on-land radioactivity for Fukashima soil and background radiation dose measurements in my April 11, 2011 blogpost ‘Greenpeace Team measurements’ Google Map‘.
The story two Belgian aspects: The main Greenpeace nuclear expert, Jan van de Putte (More here [in Dutch]), is a Belgian (from Leuven, the same town I grew up near). He directly partook in the soil sampling and is now on board the Rainbow Warrior. (Click here to help build the new ship!) Since they couldn’t find a lab in Japan to do this crucial work, the samples were taken to labs in France and… Belgium. Being originally from there, I wondered: which lab in Belgium did they use? The article didn’t say, but my first guess would be SCK-CEN, the renowned Belgian Nuclear Research Centre near the town of Mol (click banner to access site (in English, French and Dutch):
————————————————————————————————-
2) Press release by the japanese Government Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) …
http://www.mext.go.jp/component/english/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/06/19/1305757_0524.pdf
Simulation of Radioactivity Concentrations in the Sea Area (the 5th report
Press release by the japanese Government Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) …
http://www.mext.go.jp/component/english/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2011/06/19/1305757_0524.pdf
Simulation of Radioactivity Concentrations in the Sea Area (the 5th report
3. Results
http://www.irsn.fr/EN/news/Documents/IRSN_Fukushima-Accident_Impact-on-marine-environment-EN_20110404.pdf
The Japanese Fisheries Agency have released the results of studies on the relationship between the levels of 137Cs in seawater and in fish. Their research shows that the level does not, like DDT, accumulate up the food chain, but instead reaches an equilibrium. They indicate that a concentration of 1 Bq/l in seawater leads to a concentration of between 5 and 100 Bq/kg in sea animals. However the French Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN) figures are different[7].
The accumulation capacity is dependent on the metabolism of each species. In the case of caesium, the concentration factors vary from 50 for molluscs and seaweed to 400 for fish. For iodine, the concentration factors vary between 15 for fish and 10,000 for seaweed.
This means that the contamination observed at the 30km point is enough to risk pushing the contamination of fish over the Japanese limits (500 Bq/kg for 137Cs and 2000 Bq/kg for 131I.)
Thanks so much “B” for taking the time to bring us up to speed! We’re obviously in for a long haul on this.
Fukushima disaster, cover-up and fears of nuclear explosion | Independent Australia http://bit.ly/jzW8XE
RT @admin: Fukushima disaster, cover-up and fears of nuclear explosion #ABS #Arnie Gunderson #Australia nuclear waste http://t.co/CeaNpOI
[...] http://www.independentaustralia.net/2011/environment/the-truth-about-the-fukushima-nuclear-disaster-… [...]
[...] is that the reliability of claims from TEPCO, NISA and the Japanese Government are – as we have reported before – highly questionable. All three bodies have a major credibility crisis, with clear evidence that [...]
[...] June 20, Australia’s newspaper, Independent Australia (IA), reported, in an article, “Fukushima disaster, cover-up and fears of nuclear explosion,” that The [...]