Back in Jacksonville, Peter Wicks reports on a laughably fifth-rate smear campaign conducted by one of the town’s far rightwing fringe dwellers.
I have been called many things before – occasionally even complimentary, as well as plenty of them less than complimentary. I have had people accuse me of all sorts of wicked deeds and immoral acts — even by my standard.
I don’t normally mind, as that seems to be how it is these days when you upset those on the far right of the political spectrum.
This week, however, things reached a new low.
I will keep names out of this post out of respect for someone who, realistically, deserves absolutely none.
Many of you may have read my posts on the allegations of corruption at the HSU, known as the “Jacksonville” posts.
It seems Kathy Jackson still has a couple of fans out there and this week I have found out the type of people that admire her — aside from Tony Abbott and Peter Reith, of course.
On Sunday the 1st July, I received an email from a bloke whom I will refer to as Mr Spineless.
Mr Spineless claimed to be writing a piece for a blog site about my HSU posts. He asked me several questions, some of which I found irrelevant, some of which I found personal, and all of which I could have refused to answer.
In good faith, I answered all of his questions, honestly and quite quickly — all I asked was that he call me so we could discuss his piece. He then sent me more questions, which I also answered and again requested he call.
When he called, we discussed his piece and the direction it was going to head; he told me it was a piece I wouldn’t like. He told me his theory on the corruption of virtually everyone involved in the case except Jackson and Lawler. Everyone else, including the administrator, Michael Moore, and the Federal Court Judge, Justice Flick, was – in this guy’s head – corrupt, apparently.
Anyhow, this week Mr Spineless’ piece of propaganda finally surfaced. What a disappointment it turned out to be.
His piece was so well researched, he couldn’t even spell Wixxyleaks correctly, despite it being the subject of his post. There are better researched stories written on the toilet walls frequented by right wing shock-jocks.
So far, I have posted 17 articles on Wixxyleaks and Independent Australia, most of which contain something I like to refer to as evidence. Evidence that the NSW and the Vic Police have taken seriously, evidence that has been reported in The Australian, The Age, the Daily Telegraph, the Sydney Morning Herald, the Herald Sun and, of course, the ABC. Thanks to Australian Associated Press, it has also appeared on every Australian news network that uses AAP, and this includes every TV station, every major radio station, and every major newspaper.
Mr Spineless’s piece doesn’t dispute any of that evidence. None of it…
Instead it tries to attack the sources. Myself, Independent Australia, even my wife Felicity came under fire.
Independent Australia is not independent, he says. I can assure you IA is not a part of News Ltd or Fairfax. Mr Spineless probably doesn’t know what the word independent means. When he goes to his local independent bottle shop, or his local IGA, he is probably surprised not to see Wilkie, Oakeshott, or Windsor behind the counter.
I will provide you a copy of Mr Spineless’s post just to be transparent – though it really doesn’t warrant reading – but for those who seek context it will be handy. He appears to be desperately trying to get hits on his site, judging from our phone conversation and the way he shamelessly begs people to repost his blogs via Twitter and Facebook. He even explains to people not to copy and paste in emails. How desperate. Then again, he is trying to sell coffee mugs also.
The main thrust of Mr Spineless’s post is that I am an ALP member and that I have tried to conceal that from my readers.
He does have a point there. Clearly as anybody can see I have been hiding my ALP membership — it explains many of my actions. My Twitter account @pwicksalp for one. My contributors’ bio on Independent Australia that says I was an ALP Candidate is also quite concealing. Maybe the portrait pics in his post (that he took from my Facebook page) of me with ex ALP Premier Kristina Keneally — yet another secret I hid on my Facebook page. Or even the blogs I write where I mention this fact repeatedly, including the one he asked me about concerning Kristina Keneally leaving State Parliament — where I specifically mentioned being a candidate.
But alas, Sherlock Spineless discovered my supposedly well hidden secret…
He even claims I try to pose as an independent, is he for real? Even while he publishes pictures of me with Keneally?
This is so he can call me a troll. Like I went looking for a right wing blog site to trash, once again the pot and the kettle…
Mr Spineless assumes because I am an ALP member, I must talk to other members. How perceptive, most people assume we are all mutes. He is such a clever boy.

Peter Wicks, ALP’s “secret” candidate for Hawkesbury at the last NSW state election; screen shot from Hills Shire Times.
Mr Spineless’s big issue, however, relates to Kathy Jackson’s children, whose care is allegedly paid for by HSU members, if financial records are to be believed.
I agree with Mr Spineless on this, children should not be involved in these matters. I believe that it takes a particular type of scum or, as one of his readers states, someone “lower than whale shit” to involve children in this mess.
That is why I was so surprised when a couple of saints like Michael Lawler and Kathy Jackson would dump their kids in the middle of it.
Kathy Jackson has named her children countless times in relation to this case, in interviews on TV and radio — however when I repeat those names, somehow I become the bad guy. That, to me, seems odd, and just a bit desperate — not to mention hypocritical.
If naming a previously mentioned child makes you an online child stalker, Justin Bieber best beware — he seems to get mentioned quite often.
Anyway, when Mr Spineless posted his trash piece, he decided to include my mobile phone number in it. I assumed this was by accident and emailed him asking him to take it down. Instead he posted my request on his blog and included my number again.
Not wanting things to get silly, I attempted to phone him, he didn’t answer. A bit later I hid my number and tried again, he encouraged me to email him again, then refused to speak to me and hung up. Real mature.
Anyway, I wouldn’t really care too much, as it is clear by the number of calls I got, a country town dead end street at 3am gets more traffic than his online coffee mug store/propaganda site. It is the way he chooses to promote his trash that I really take issue with.
Here is the teaser tweet we sent out to his handful of followers on Twitter:
“ALP member stalks children online & takes offence at being outed”
I do not think naming 2 children, whose names I only know due to previous reports where they are specifically named, makes me a sicko.
Nor does it give someone the right to try and portray me as a paedophile, as his tweet seems to do. To me this is the act of a real sicko. What makes someone even think that? I hate to think.
This also belittles authentic accusations against real child sex offenders and makes a mockery of victims of abuse. This, to me, is a twisted mind; to even think that way is blood curdling.
If the Jackson fan club chose to fight evidence by posting unfounded remarks about those with evidence being online child stalkers, and listing their phone numbers, then it is a strange world on the fringes of Jacksonville indeed.
Here are some other tweets Mr Spineless used.
“ALP Troll Peter Wicks & #Thomson supporter takes offence at being outed”
”#Thomson & ALP boy Peter Wicks harass intimidate & stalk key witness #Jackson & her children ”
#Thomson conspires with ALP boy Peter Wicks to harass intimidate and stalk key witness #Jackson & her children
After these remarks, I decided to go to the police, as disgraceful conduct like this should not go unreported. The quotes below show my correspondence after I gave my statement; I have only removed the officers details. I cannot show his email due to the police disclaimer, however it gives an event number, and gives me a recommendation on how to proceed, and this line discussing Mr Spineless’s counter claims.
‘obviously made counter claims in regards to things you have posted about him and he has received death threats from your supporters.’
My Response:
I appreciate your efforts, I knew he would make a counter claim, and yes I did let people know what he had said about me. He should have thought about that before he made his insinuating remarks, after all he chooses to make his mobile number public on his website, I do not.
I have not encouraged any threats at all, in fact of the people who have rang to abuse me, at least 2 of them were calling him back for misleading them about me.
It is interesting also to note that according to the story about me on his website, one of my “supporters” was sending him death threats due to his story before he even wrote it or put it online, this seems unlikely in the extreme, a bit like me complaining today about something I will see on TV next week even though I don’t know I will be seeing it…
Anyway, thanks again for your assistance on this matter, and if there are any further developments I will let you know.
Thanks
Yes, I did post Mr Spineless’s mobile number on my Facebook page – in good faith, I have removed it now – and via Twitter once. However, I choose to keep my number private, his number is openly available to all via his online store/propaganda site; as such, any complaints he has about me making his number public are ridiculous.
As for death threats to him, I am not involved in any way with that. However, if you put your number on your site, and advertise the site by accusing others falsely of stalking children – here’s a tip for young players – I think you should expect the odd angry call…
As for this Eric bloke, described as one of my “supporters” like I’m a footy team. Eric, who allegedly sent the death threat described in Mr Spineless’s post is, according to Mr Spineless, a regular at his site.
Judging from Mr Spineless’s Twitter follower numbers, it’s safe to say nobody much has heard of his site — or if they have, they were not impressed. I had certainly never heard of it before he contacted me.
This alleged Eric person is not someone I know and Mr Spineless seems to be the one emailing him — certainly not me.
Despite the call from the police, my number remains on Mr Spineless’s site. Not that I’m surprised.
In other related news, in the upcoming HSU executive elections, it seems Kathy Jackson herself will be running her own ticket. This has come as quite a surprise to all — maybe Jeff needs another car.
Still, if Mr Spineless is a member of the HSU, I guess she has at least 1 vote.
If anyone really wants to read his trash piece, you can access it via the link below.
[Read the trash piece.]
That way he won’t get the hits he so desperately hopes for.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License











25 Comments
Priceless…
You’re right, Peter, ‘desperate’ is the word. And unscrupulous, shameless, pathetic, disgusting, unethical …
I won’t be reading the Spineless piece on principle.
This guy has mental issues.
Have you read his letter to Justice Flick? I will quote the part where he gives ‘evidence’:
————————————-
As I am sure you are also aware Michael Moore’s bribe taking ways are well documented in the book I wrote “booknameremoved”
In fact there is even a picture of me on the front cover holding a sign saying “Justice Moore Federal Court of Australia takes bribes”. The same picture you would have seen in the affidavit that is in the court files you had for the appeal. (people can see for themselves on the website – websiteremoved.com)
————————————-
A picture of the author holding a sign? Damning stuff indeed. As you may have gathered from the excerpt, this guy had a court case, lost, had an appeal, lost, and therefore the judiciary is corrupt.
It would be hilarious if he wasn’t so obviously in need of serious psychiatric help.
I removed the name of his book and site because giving him hits will only feed his sense of self importance. Anyone can easily find them if they feel like wasting a portion of their life they will never ever get back.
Interestingly, this guy used to work for one of the major newspapers(his dismissal is the reason for his court cases), and he was too nuts for even them to retain. Kind of gives you an idea of his mentality and credibility.
I did actually point out in his comments section that Kathy Jackson had named her children on public radio (and it appears other places) and Mr Wicks was simply quoting that.
Unfortunately the owner of the blog did not allow such comments to appear.
Did you notice Kathy is lodging an appeal against her sacking but she wants everyone else but a few of her supporters to stay sacked.
I notice the marked similarities between Kathy Jackson’s behaviour and that of Mr Spineless. Both delusional. Both self-styled legal experts. Neither believes their s*#t stinks. I wonder, are they the same person? Has anyone ever seen them in the same room together?
Marilyn, I am sure she’s not appealing due to the loss of $270k, eh, um, yeah, she’s doing it for the principle, whatever that is.
My advice Mr Wicks is have your check whether Mr Spineless has enough wealth that would enable you to sue him for libel and damages as his web postings are most certainly defamatory and accuse you of crimes.
He also libels you (in only a minor way) by accusing you of hiding your Labor credentials which is nonsense (and you look quite handsome in that pic with the gorgeous Ms Keneally )but when one adds all his allegations together, they form a completely defamatory article (and that includes the allegation that a ‘supporter” threatened him).
It’s a bad attempt at a hatchet job and note how he claims Craig Thomson has an up-coming court case (??) and even demands you and Mr Donovan should be jailed !!!(and chance of a trial first?)
As one of the many thousands who sued the late News Of The World ( I wept when it closed) for libel I heartily recommend it not only for the pleasure of having a News Corp brief read an apology in the High Court(UK) but the damages bought me a lovely new Mini which I called ‘Rupert’ in honour of the great man.
## surely Craig Johnson will never have to work again-there are so many in the queue for him to sue.
Whether good or bad, the Administrator is all powerful and has God-like powers and she should know this.
Oscar, he doesn’t have any assets to sue for, a journalist has already directly questioned him on this in regards to him posting defamatory stuff about the Shorten affair, and why Shorten chose to go to the media instead of court.
Checked out his website, on his picture he does look familiar, just cant put my finger on it. If he was really fair dinkum he would be chasing Abbott and any potential links to Slipper and Thomson affairs. He would have also noted that Peter has never said that Craig Thomson is innocent. Peter has only ever presented the facts and left it to the reader to make up their own mind. That is what we would expect from an independent journalist. I also Note on his site, his only response is that you are obvious lying and should face charges re naming KJ’s children. Also the vitriol from commenters on his blog show the level of intelligence of his supporters. They have not read your jacksonville blogs. Also not one of your accusations are repudiated.
I would Classify myself as slightly left of centre. However just like the overtly right wing views on his site, anything overtly left wing on here i would tend to skip over.
Peter i say, keep up the good work, as this guy sounds like a Liberal party stooge with no ethics.
I saw the blog you are referring to. I tried to post a response – along the lines of I was tired of all the innuendo and trial by gossip from all sides and I think it is time for a Royal commission into the whole saga – looking at Thomson, Jackson, Lawler, Williamson and whatever dirty hands from both major parties are involved. My post was deleted after a few minutes. Apparently that blog doesn’t allow for people to take a middle of the road approach, calling for a way of finding out the truth.
I have just read the findings of this man in his case against his former employer. The man it seems is arrogant to an absurd degree. His bullying of his female direct manger is disturbing to say the least. He blamed everyone else for his own poor work ethics. He used is usual tactic of not responding directly to allegations made. Everyone else it seems to be wrong or telling lies. As others have mentioned, on another website, i think he may have some sort of Aspergers/autism and he would be advised to seek medical advice. From the rantings on his own website and his behaviour towards his former employer, one may conclude he is a very nasty spineless little man.
my one big gripe about the internet is that it has become a giant posting board for Poison Pen Letters although in this case, the bloke isn’t anonymous.
Everything the author accuses Wixxy of he actually does himself ie : he names the Lawlers and then extrapolates that harm could come to them from criminals because of that and that Wixxy would be to blame-having just done what he accuses Wixxy of !
shame on you Peter Wicks!…for actually responding to this bloke.
and shame on me for having the curiosity of a cat and finding my way to his website.
But I’ve been there before and after reading what is there it became clear that the guy obviously has it in for the entire judicial system because of some personal battle.
I’m experiencing this myself-being on the winning side of a legal fight and the losing side makes all the same claims: corrupt judges/barristers/lawyers etc.
Not once in his article does he say that he has his own personal gripe against Justice Moore which aligns him with Ms Jackson. And that is the source of his vitriol towards Wicks.
He has a great fan : the wondrous Holocaust Denier Fredrick Toben of the whacko Adelaide Institute has posted his support!!
“It is well-known that reporters should disclose anything that gives the apprehension of bias” (quote from Mr Spineless)
Sadly he omits from his defamatory piece on Peter Wikks that his own personal legal involvements (on the losing side) involve both Justices’ Frick & Justice Moore who he outrageously claims are ‘corrupt’ while offering no evidence apart from his book.
I wonder if Gina Rinehart has considered offering him a job? She can put him on right after Bolt. Wouldn’t that be some fantastic programming!
It worries me that Mr Spineless who does not disclose his own prejudicial involvements with personalities that are contained within his Wixxy attacks was ever inside the Fairfax stable !!
Then again perhaps they had very good reasons to let him go.
I don’t dismiss everything the blogger says.
Nassios is to appear before a Senate committee soon
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/industrial-relations/nassios-to-be-grilled-on-hsu-inquiry/story-fn59noo3-1226424883094
We will see if the material that the ALP affiliated Peter Wicks has brought up has any bearing on the questions asked of him by the Labour members.
If it doesn’t, then perhaps Mr Spineless might have a point.
I dismiss everything the blogger says.
He is an absolute disgrace. He libels everyone without presenting a scintilla of proof. He makes the giant leap of conclusions that because he accuses someone of criminal activity and they didn’t sue, ipso facto it must be true.
He makes spurious claims about every legal officer without presenting any facts. He outrageously uses the name Kangaroo Court when his blog is an internet kangaroo court of false claims and conclusions reached on thin air.
He is like many people who lose court cases. It’s never to do with the fact they had no case-everyone else is corrupt. He makes the idiotic claim that Freehills bribed judges over his case. It’s a patently ludicrous idea.
He is also a fool. I have been hired and fired twice by Fairfax and sued both times for money owing and they used Freehills and I reached amicable settlements both times. Why the hell would a law firm need to bribe judges on behalf of their clients in a civil matter?
I must get off this merry-go-round and this is my last word.
Mr Spineless is one of the nastiest pieces of work on the web. His tawdry piece on Bill Shorten is vile.
Mark Day has made very good points about the recklessness of some bloggers. They don’t seem to give a stuff about who they hurt.
Had viewed the KC site a few months ago and became disinterested due to the rantings. It appears judging by the comments made, that not much has changed. How ironic that he wrote he was against crime and corruption
Well done Peter for writing such investigative and evidential articles. Have sent a number of friends and family to IA to read them.
I happened to watch the movie ‘The Informant!’ yesterday, without any knowledge of what it was about.
Some of the delusional similarities between Kathy Jackson and Mark Whitacre (as portrayed by Matt Damon) are hilarious.
Particularly the part where she considers that her whistle-blowing(if true) should waive her liability to any criminal misconduct, so that she might retain her position in the union.
Hi Peter
I am keen to get your analysis of the Temby Report on the Health Services Union. I have just listened to the Midday report on Radio National and am very concerned that the ABC is promoting Abetz’s line. This is based on Midday’s reference to Thompson being Williamson’s protégé. I look forward to your thorough and intelligent analysis.
Basil00
I do not think it is autism /Asbergers. I am Asbergers: socially inept, unable to emp, missing social cues etc.
I think what we are looking at, if we add info from Peter and the subsequent comments is sociopath. One who will push aside or injure others in pursuit of his own aim. Or it could be mental illness. I only know it aint autism