The plot thickens in Jacksonville as the bank trace on the $22,000 meant to have be transferred to Wai Quen Chan in Hong Kong for legal fees comes back — and points to an Australian car dealer’s account. Peter Wicks reports.
TODAY I have a couple of updates on the HSU investigation I have been reporting on.
[Go to the dedicated Jacksonville page, to get up-to-date on this investigation.]
Not long ago, I reported on a payment that was made to Wai Quen Chan by HSU Branch number 3, under the control of Kathy Jackson.
The payment to Wai Quen Chan was for $22,000, which is, I’m sure you will agree, quite a substantial amount of money.
The payment was attributed to legal services by Kathy Jackson’s union branch. I have put a link to the documentation below.
See the Wai Quen receipt.
It needs to be remembered that to misrepresent a payment of this type may constitute a fraudulent act — which is a criminal offence.
It is unclear what legal services Jackson thought the union members needed in Hong Kong, where Wai Quen Chan is based. Nevertheless, $22,000 was reported to have been transferred to Wai Quen Chan, despite there being no invoice to back up the payment.
After I published the documents related to this payment, Andrew Landeryou from Vex News contacted Wai Quen Chan about the payment.
Andrew thought he would try to obtain the answer that the Acting General Secretary of HSU East, Peter Mylan, had been unable to obtain, despite his letter to her.
Wai Quen Chan was, to her credit, most helpful indeed. Quen stated that she had not performed any legal services for the HSU since she left the union. She had not performed legal services for the HSU since leaving Australia, and she had never raised an invoice for legal services. She later confirmed these things in writing.
This raises the question of where the money went — since it seems it didn’t go to Wai Quen.
I will get to that…
Some of you may remember there was talk of a car that Kathy Jackson’s ex-husband, Jeff Jackson, was rumoured to have come into possession of, care of the union. That car was a white Mercedes Benz, supposedly imported from Asia at around the same time this payment to Wai Quen was supposed to have been made.
Well, speculation and rumour don’t cut it in the real world, so I am pleased to tell you that a bank trace has been performed on the payment to see where the members’ money ended up.
I am now able to report the results of this trace, as the police have been fully briefed and are in possession of all the evidence.
It turns out that the $22,000 never was sent to Wai Quen — she was telling the truth. This is also confirmation that the person who authorised the payment from the union did so fraudulently. Of course, the branch was then under the control of Kathy Jackson.
The money in fact went to an Australian bank account. The owner of this account is a man by the name of Daniel Tsz Leung Chan.
Daniel, it turns out is Wai Quen’s brother; that seems an amazing coincidence to me, but it gets better.
Although I have as yet been able to track down Daniel to ask him if he’d ever sold the white Mercedes to Jeff or Kathy, there is something else that grabbed my attention; of course, it may just be a coincidence. There is a company registered to a Daniel Tsz Leung Chan in Australia by the name of First Eastern Pty Ltd. Someone with the exact same name is coincidence enough, but First Eastern’s trading name is Hawthorn Motors. More car dealing?
Hmmm.
Unfortunately, it seems Hawthorn Motors has disappeared, and I suspect, like his sister, Daniel may have moved to Hong Kong. I will keep trying to track him down though.
Anyway, the two things we know for certain are, the money didn’t go to Wai Quen, and it wasn’t for legal services in Hong Kong, as the documentation states.
Another thing that I thought I should mention is that Kathy has explained the $58,000 payment to her ex-husband Jeff from the HSU number 3 cheque account in April 2010. It seems that Jeff was still owed some entitlements from when he worked there.
See the April 2010 Statement.
I guess that is fair enough…
But, hang on a sec… How many months was it since Jeff had worked there? 12 months, actually.
Oh, and wasn’t Jeff working at the number 1 branch?
It makes no sense whatsoever to me that Jeff would be paid any entitlements from the number 3 branch. That would be like working for Coles and then getting your entitlements paid to you, a year after you finished, from Target.
Finally, many readers have asked about the Hyundai that showed up on the bank statements. Although Jeff Jackson was driving around in a nice Hyundai SUV care of HSU members money until the administrator was appointed— our investigation is yet to uncover a Hyundai that costs $77,000. Then again, we still haven’t found out where the extra approximately $5,000 on the cash cheque for Kathy’s Volvo ended up either.
See the Volvo Receipt and EFT Transfer.
See the Volvo Cash Cheque.
Hmmm…

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License










21 Comments
New developments in #Jacksonville 14 as bank trace comes back. http://t.co/iBtYrauR
WOW -> “@independentaus: New developments in #Jacksonville 14 as bank trace comes back. http://t.co/1vfxAMja”
Once again, DA MIND BOGGLES!!
I wonder what an audit by a firm such as PriceWaterhouseCooper or Ernest & Young would unearth.
It’s becoming increasingly obvious that the reason Kathy Jackson hand-delivered files to FWA is so she could control what was investigated and what wasn’t.
BTW, has anyone been able to ascertain the nature of the vital work performed by Lawler’s schoolboy sons at rates 1 1/2 times the salary of your average HSU member?
Good work once again Peter, and the plot indeed thickens.
Do you know if the administrators brief/terms of reference allow him to investigate the evidence that you have uncovered, and if he is able to recommend criminal charges, or is it restricted to an internal audit?
Just curious.
In case you missed it last night, the latest from #Jacksonville by @madwixxy. http://t.co/X1ho2dSU
Thanks Peter for another tall tale but true from Jacksonville. Keep your head down; we don’t want to lose the country’s best investigative reporter.
If it became apparent tomorrow that Craig Thomson had spent $25 on a car wash and this was not accounted for – I suspect he would be on the front pages. Meanwhile, the media at large continue to adopt a ‘nothing to see here’ policy with the most incredible allegations.
Peter / David – I have asked before – are you banging your heads on walls OR are the MSM meeting your expectations ??
I suspect the MSM are meeting all our expectations which were that they would do nothing.
Like the cretins in AAP reporting that some non-existent kingpin smuggler has been arrested in Indonesia because we let refugees drown and somehow that is his fault.
Can’t wait to read your coverage of the court case and subsequent sentencing of these Jackson’s and their cronies. Better still will be the exposure of their backers for the liars and cheats that they are. Watch your back, there are some dark forces at work in Australian politics.
“Brother”?? You might want to do a bit more research on that.
Mate, your story appears to be compelling until one looks at what you have omitted. You allege that Jackson made a payment of $22,000 to this Wai Quen Chen and you provide a document purporting to be a financial record of that transaction. So you obviously, as I think you have admitted, have such documents in your possession. Then you go on to say that the money was not paid to Wai Quen Chen, but her brother. You claim there is evidence of this (and indeed Bank records for Jackson’s branch would show this). Given that you have been provided documents, you would have that one (the smokin’ gun). Yet you provide no link to the telling bank document that would show a payment of $22,000 to this woman’s brother the car salesman and not her. Why not? Very strange Mr. Wicks, is there a reason for this telling omission?
On the subject of documents leaked to you, where they leaked to you by Michael Williamson, his glove puppet Peter Mylan, or indeed Craig Thomson? I think how you got such documents is important in underlining their credibility, so you should disclose that.
Also, did you in an off the record discussion with journalist Milanda Rout of The Australian, tell her that you were running stories against Kathy Jackson and suggesting that the case against Craig Thomson is a conspiracy theory, in a hope that you would endear yourself to the ALP, so that you may be preselected? I think it’s important that you answer that question. Mmmmmmmmm
BigJobbies, I assume that is your real name and you are not one of those gutless people that uses a made up name that is aimed to make you seem even more intelligent….
I’m glad you find the posts compelling.
Alas I do not have the the record of that transaction you speak of, or I would have put a link up, however you are free to contact the media relations dept of the Victorian police and verify, with a name like yours I’m sure you will not be questioned. If I don’t have the record, that is my reason for it’s ommission.
I have a number of sources, none of which I am going to share with you I’m afraid to say. I have recieved the information re this from 2 seperate sources and it has been confirmed by the HSU, and Vic police have confirmed recieving it.
It really makes no difference who my leaks are, the evidence I have published has not been disputed, in fact it has been verified by Jackson in her press statements. if the evidence was sup[lied to me by the Yellow Wiggle it wouldn’t matter, it is still legitimate.
If you had read my posts, you would have seen that I don’t know Michael Williamson. I don’t know Peter Mylan, and have never met or spoken to him. I have met Chis Brown once, well and truly weeks after leaking documents. As for Craig Thomson, on an absolute idiot would think that he has access to current HSU records, so don’t bother with that, IA readers have far more intelligence than that…
I had one discussion with Milanda Rout, and it was on record. As yet I remain extremely unconvinced on the case againgst Craig Thomson, so I may have told her that I thought there was the possibilty of a conspiracy, it seems to look more that way everyday. As for the pre-selection talk, that is total and utter crap.
A liitle something about where I’m from, I live in the safest Liberal seat in the state. My ALP branch is tiny, if I want to be pre-selected, all I have to do is say I will run, that is it. When I ran last time, they had to seek approval from Sussex St as I had not been a member long enough, but nobody else would run…
So your pre-selection theories are just delusional ranting.
Before you jump to any other wild conclusions, I do not want to run in any area that I don’t live, and I’m not planning on moving…
So, there you go, questions answered Mr or Mrs Jobbies
I hope my next post is just as compelling
Wixxy
Thank BigJobbies!!
I was intrigued by this whole affair before your comments. Now that I know ‘someones’ cage has been rattled – well I’m completely hooked.
In the Sunday Telegraph on 15/4/2012 Kathy Jackson stated that Jeff jackson was due his Long Service Leave entitlements and part of the deal with Michael Williamson was that he held on to his car. They organised it until his LS leave is paid out, yet KJ’s explaination above states that the $58,000 payment to JJ were entitlements owed.This was paid on 7/5/2010 yet his term expired in Oct 2010. and he still had the car until June 2012. Something does not sound right Mmmmmmm
Word was that Jeff was selling used American cars as his sea change occupation…was that in Hawthorn?
Peter, I can’t say how relieved I was to discover your articles on this matter. Iv’e been reading for the last few weeks now.
I was at my wits end with the MSM in regards to both this and the Slipper case. While it was clear to me immediately that Slipper was most likely being set up(thanks to James Ashbys own media releases, and a colourful, well documented history), I could not say the same for Thomson. I was aghast at allegations he had rorted hundreds of thousands of dollars, and the implications this held for the integrity of the Government. I searched constantly for information, but kept coming up with the same tired old opinions being published in place of facts.
Then one of you stories turned up in my search results
You provide facts, analysis, and when you give your opinion, it is clear that it is your opinion. Thank you. Too many journalists today are taking the posture once only displayed by shock jocks, with the accompanying overblown sense of self importance, and lack of accountability.
I am somewhat disturbed by the MSM reporting on this issue. If a reporter sniffs blood in the water, then a feeding frenzy is on. The documents you are releasing are the equivalent of a giant rotting whale carcass floating in the sea, yet for some reason the hungry sharks are swimming by, not taking a bite.
That is the big picture here for me. If they are all willing to let this stuff be swept under the carpet in favour of any story that is anti-government, what else are they willing to let slide? The implications are staggering, and their motivations, unclear.
Peter, thank you, I have been following this story since I found this site a couple of months ago. I have passed this site onto anyone who is after the truth. It seems so sad that our so called media outlets seemed to have forgotten how to investigate a story and then do have the backbone to follow up on your reports as I am sure they know about this site now.
I am now a regular reader of this site.
Once again thanks.
Additionally Mr Jobbies, not that Peter needs me to defend him… how would this series ‘endear’ the author to the ALP, which has at not stage made any effort to defend Thomson? This whole affair reflects very poorly on the political judgement of the Gillard ‘team’.
Well said Matt! Your feeding frenzy analogy is spot on. There appears to be more going on here than condescension by MSM to alternative media. The voraciousness of msm for the grubbiness of the Thomson story isn’t matched by a similar interest in the entrails of the Vic no 3 branch. At best, intriguing. At worst, a matter for concern..
Couldn’t agree more with the above letters.
Craig Thomson states he tried to improve upaccountabilty and clean up the union but says he has been set up.
Kathy Jackson says she also tried to clean up the union as well but but has also been set up.
CT gets a photo in the MSM with a photo-shopped nose and the headline “we don’t beleive you”
KJ is portrayed as a brave and courageous women who should be admired.
another Hmmmmmmm moment
But then KJ doesn’t hold a seat in a minority govt does she
Matt, my experiences exactly.
The MSM is very strange at present. Not only are stories ignored, but stories are slanted against the Gillard government. I listen to AM and PM. Recently a string of stories followed the same pattern: announce a Gillard Government initiative, interview the federal opposition, then a fellow journalist. I wait for the interview with the minister or the notice that they were contacted, but it does not come. Does this mean they did the story without interviewing the originators of the action? Not surprisingly, they routinely present an unfavourable opinion of the Federal government.
Their motivations?
Murdochs are being explored in the UK at present, so I trust my fellow commenters are or can be fully informed. Looking at Google news, Murdoch’s opinion dominates because of the number of identical listings, but why are Fairfax and ABC going along with it? The most compelling suggestion I have read is that they wish to stop the media enquiry. It does not seem sufficient for the bile being printed and transmitted.
Matt, I realised about three months ago that, before the internet, I would not have known any of this. Peter Wicks would not have been heard or printed. I would have stopped reading newspapers (I stopped watching TV as soon as I got a computer game) and would have trusted ABC radio…..
I fear we are subject to the most concerted propaganda campaign for about 80 years. If the polls are accurate, the electorate has been convinced that a good government is incompetent, unstable and bad….
I too have recently discovered the Independent Australia, and give addresses for a few similar sites:
http://grogsgamut.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/fairfax-and-g20-visits-what-do-we-need.html
http://www.thepowerindex.com.au/politics/
http://www.theglobalmail.org/
http://australianpolitics.com/news/2003/08/03-08-26a.shtml
My mainstay is the Drum, ABC. Often, I ignore the story, simply reading the comments, which let me get the feel of how my fellow commenters are thinking. Recently 80% of comments by we the people (to borrow an Americanism) were favourable to the Gillard Government. More remarkably, a story in the Daily Telegraph ran at 32 out of 40 comments favourable, until the moderators woke up. The second half of the comments reverted to Murdoch’s usual 90% unfavourable.
I am not sure what will happen at the next election, but my gut feeling is this is the best government I have lived under.
I have emailed Kathy Jackson several times asking her to justify a salary of k270 and a car worth k90.
I am a member of two unions, active in one of them and subsequently in a position to know of my organisers/officials salaries. The union is one of the biggest and most powerful. Not one of the organisers/officials receive more than k100. and all drive locally made modest cars.
Bear in mind the wages earned by the members of my union would probably be double or more on average than the HSU members!
Funny, Kathy has lots of doorstops, media appearances and bleats loud and long about corruption.
Obviously Kathy is now impoverished and hasn’t got a union funded email account. Perhaps she can use her partner’s whilst he is on leave.
Still waiting for a response Kathy, still waiting.