In the latest radical conservative assault on science, US Republican Congressman Todd Akin has claimed “legitimate” rape victims rarely get pregnant. Contributing editor-at-large Tess Lawrence comments.
US Congressman Todd Akin is a Republican, the son of a Preacher man, and a fave of the Tea Party — but that is no excuse for saying the following in an interview on St Louis KTVI yesterday, when asked his views on abortion and rape:
“If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
Does it really, Todd? Is that how it goes?
What’s a ‘legitimate rape’, Todd? Come to think of it, what’s an illegitimate rape?
And just how many ‘ways’ are there to try to shut down that ‘whole thing’?
Or do you mean ‘that hole thing’ as in Courtney Love, without the love.
Can’t bear to say the words, Mr Akin? And what exactly are those ‘ways’, Congressman?
And how hard does the female body ‘try to shut down that whole thing’? And what do you mean by ‘that whole thing?’
And what if your female body doesn’t try hard enough? Does that mean your female body is really begging for it?
It is horrifying to note that Akin is a man who has already spent 12 years as a congressman and is now running for the Senate.
From whence spews this distorted misogynistic fundamentalist poligangsta rap claptrap?
Has he been to a Taliban or Al Shabaab male bonding love-in? Or to an Aussie Rules after game party?
Next he’ll be demanding four male witnesses to the rape.
Was he indoctrinated in this tripe at the Covenant Theological Seminary where he strangely earned a Master of Divinity.
For heaven’s sake, this dangerous and repugnant loon squats on the Congress Committee on Science, Space and Technology.
OpenCongress tells us that Akin is active in the Boy Scouts Movement.
And, wouldn’t you know it, he’s against same sex marriage.
This is what OC says about his stand on that issue:
Akin opposes same-sex marriage and called the 2004 decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Court an act of “judicial activism [that is] undermining the sanctity of marriage ” and argued that a state-based law “seeks to usurp the legislative authority of elected representatives” and called for a U.S. constitutional amendment. A month later, apparently rethinking his position on federalism, he supported a state-level ban on same-sex marriage in Missouri.
When I read the scorching headlines about Todd Akin’s offensive and derogatory remarks, I thought his name rang a loud bell.
Laura Helmuth on Slate was right on the case:
Akin’s past includes praising a militia group linked to anti-abortion extremism in the 1990s and voting against creating a sex-offender registry in 2005. Back in 1991, as a state legislator, Akin voted for an anti-marital-rape law, but only after questioning whether it might be misused “in a real messy divorce as a tool and a legal weapon to beat up on the husband,” according to a May 1 article that year in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch (via LexisNexis).
Of course, Akin is not alone in his views. Todd’s views are akin to those of a couple of Australian judges, I recall.
One judge actually stated that if a woman wanted to prevent a rape, all she had to do was to keep her legs together.
And I recall another judge giving a rapist a lesser sentence because his victim was a prostitute and thus used to being penetrated — so it was considered to be less of a trauma to her.
All of this is a continuum of blaming the victim. It makes pregnant rape victims feel confused.
There is the notion that if you’re not engaged in consensual sexual intercourse, then your reproductive ‘juices’ will shut down and protect you from becoming pregnant.
Tell that to the millions of women and girls who are raped with impunity each year, including those civilians who are the victims of military rapes.
It is frightening to note that Todd Akin also sits on the Armed Services Committee and the Sea Power and Projections Committee.
This morning Akin, is reeling from the fallout of his cruel and malicious bile — his electoral chances slip away in favour of Democrat incumbent Claire McCaskill, who has wasted no time in publishing Akin’s remarks on her website.
McCaskill is going in for the kill. And with good reason, given her background. From her website:
After graduation, Claire was off to Kansas City where she first worked as a research attorney for the Court of Appeals. She then became one of the few women prosecuting criminal cases as an assistant prosecutor in the Jackson County Prosecuting Attorneys Office. Claire spent four years in the court room, trying cases involving kidnapping, sexual assault, child abuse, and homicide. She specialized in arson prosecution, becoming one of the nation’s experts in this difficult area.
She served in the Missouri House of Representatives from 1983 to 1988, where she was a leader on criminal justice issues. She earned the Outstanding Legislator Award from the Missouri Association of Prosecuting Attorneys in 1987. She was also the first woman to give birth while serving as a legislator when her son Austin was born in 1987.
In 1992, Claire broke another barrier by becoming the first woman elected Jackson County prosecutor. Her office was the largest prosecutor’s office in the state, handling thousands of felony cases on an annual basis. During her term, she put more criminals behind bars than any other Missouri prosecutor, established a special Domestic Violence Unit to combat domestic violence and child abuse, created one of America’s first Drug Courts, and established new and effective ways to combat the serious problem of meth in the greater Kansas City area.
President Barack Obama seized the chance to cut Akin down to size. The BBC reported:
“The views expressed were offensive,” Mr Obama told reporters.
“Rape is rape and the idea that we should be parsing and qualifying and slicing what types of rape we are talking about doesn’t make sense to the American people and certainly doesn’t make sense to me.”
It doesn’t make sense to me either. Or to many of us, male or female. We haven’t come a long way, Baby. No doesn’t mean No. It apparently means ‘if’ and ‘maybe’.
And according to the likes of Todd Akin, you can be a little bit pregnant. If you are raped.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License









20 Comments
What a gormless idiot. How can it possibly be, in this century, that such idiotic, puerile and just plain stupidly ignorant comments be made?
Such is the mindset of Rethuglicans. But what really confounds me is that women will vote these clowns in! It’s sad, so very very sad.
let this be a warning to campbell newman. take the science out of education and THIS is the kind of thinking you end up with.
Dear TUNGSTENATOR, the tragic reality is that AKIN is not alone in such dangerous and malevolent idiocy.
And he has a vote on behalf of AMERICANS!
Dear JUSME, you are so right. This is a horrible wake up call.
But the thing is, AKIN is actually on a SCIENCE COMMITTEE – so what has he voted for – and against – all the years he has been in
office ?
TODD AKIN WIMPS OUT ON PIERS MORGAN INTERVIEW – PIERS CALLS HIM A “GUTLESS LITTLE TWERP” – From the HUFF POST: –
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/20/todd-akin-piers-morgan-interview_n_1814683.html?utm_source=DailyBrief&utm_campaign=082112&utm_medium=email&utm_content=FeatureTitle&utm_term=Daily%20Brief
independent australia on "probably politically motivated alleg's of rape" http://t.co/lqiGvIMU and "blaming the victim" http://t.co/KvlwoLs7
absolutely agree with you, tess … but am disturbed by the comment made by tungstenator above (“such is the mindset of Rethuglicans”)…aussies have no idea of day-to-day political machinations in the US because your info comes from liberal media bias. you are not seeing firsthand how this once-great country is going down the toilet because of lack of leadership, and political infighting. i am a registered Republican and i today signed a petition to urge rep. akin to resign, adding that he is a disgrace. i am being charitable. NOONE with such a mindset should be a representative of the people, no matter his or her political affiliation. EVERYONE i know agrees, across the board. but consider this email i also received today, from a registered DEMOCRAT. it should give you a good idea of the kind of climate we americans are living in, where politics trumps morality any day: “What I am reading is that his resignation would be bad for the Dems. since they MUST win this election in order to maintain a majority in the Senate. It is better to have a Republican candidate who will not win than give the Republicans a chance to unseat the current democrat. Tricky business. He has to make a decision about withdrawing by the end of the day today.”
To me, this person is as disgusting as todd akin.
While the Republicans rush to distance themselves from Akin, and call for his standing down, it seems it is but a dissimulation campaign to draw attention away from the Republican National Committee’s anti-abortion bill with a “no-exemption” clause for cases involving rape and incest.
The problem for Republicans is not that he holds these views, but that he was stupid enough to open his mouth and cost them votes.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/21/todd-akin-gop-platform-rape_n_1818532.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular
Dear HELEN FREEDMAN, I know you’e the Helen Freedman of journalist/editor/publisher and bogan expert fame, and given your US/OZ perspective I heed what you’re saying.
Reading your comment I am struck with the thought that if we substituted US for Australia and Republicans and Democrats for
Labor and Coalition Opposition, you could just as easily be
talking about the ghastly predicament in which we the people find ourselves floundering, in Australia.
The fact is,our Governments have lost the art and ability of Governance and decisions are now made on party and factional lines with the sole intent being retaining power.
That is not Democracy. It is Shamocracy.
It is time We the Peoples reclaimed our Governments and reminded our politicians that they are public servants and that we are not
enslavened to our own bondage of hollow men and women, politics and ideals.
You have pointed out the obscene party gameplay that goes on in politics. In that, as in so many other things, Australia and the United States, are one.
And we in the Media have much to answer for. We so often daily betray The People too.
Dear MATT, spot on, and the more one delves into TODD AKIN’s political life, the more uneasy I feel.
The behind the scenes counter-strategies are insidious and contagious poliitics.
What else is he thinking that he hasn’t voiced out aloud?
Thanks for the link Matt, to the Huff Post report, too.
Hi Tess,
Regarding Helens comments, I have a somewhat different perspective.
I had a chuckle to myself after I posted my comment and noticed that at the same time Helen had posted hers. I thought it provided a perfect illustrative first hand example of what I was talking about. Unadulterated, straight from the horses mouth so to speak. Her words appear so orchestrated, that it couldn’t have been more perfect.
It is a bit rich to try to compare Akins statements with the glee of Democrats who are happy that this man has shown his cards to the voters. The man is a disgrace, but people using the argument of ‘letting someone better try to beat the Democrat’ shows just how their political motivations are also more important to them(not the fact that this is the best guy they could find to run). I don’t disagree with the gist of what they are saying, in fact, I think that we are best served when we have good politicians on all sides. However, Helen still tries to insist that her(Republican) intentions are pure, yet those nasty Democrats will stoop at nothing, when she is doing exactly the same thing. Absolute hypocrisy, and completely irrelevant. The Democrats have zero sway over whether Akin stays or goes. The fact that Republicans(and Mitt Romney in particular) were initially slow to move with the criticism, looking more to play it down, and that he is still running under a Republican banner, shows just how uncommitted the Republican party is to getting rid of this guy. ‘Why is that?’, one is left to wonder… Could it be that the party has others who share similar batshit insane ideas that dare not see the light of day?(Answer: of course there is, they are on the record, and the abortion bill illustrates it clearly). Might they be worried about upsetting such screwballs lest they get all hot under the collar and make some kind of politically suicidal public statement in defence of Akin? You don’t get to run if you don’t have considerable allies.
Please don’t take this as my view of all people who call themselves Republican.
That’s not to say I disgree with you though Tess, on the contrary, I agree completely.
Great piece Tess… Eve Ensler also had a moving take on how disgusting and abhorrent this guy’s views are. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eve-ensler/todd-akin-rape_b_1812930.html
Dear MATT, one of the spin offs about AKIN’s pathetic comment is that others in the electoral frontline have been forced to reveal where they stand on his disgraceful attitude.
And it’s likely that those who share similar views to him will shut up and/or mask their real attitude. Either way it’s scarey.
Dear JESSE_WG…thanks so much for your support and helpful link and will check out EVE ENSLER’s article too.
RUTH MADDOW ASKS WHY WE’RE NOT OUTRAGED ABOUT PAUL RYAN’S ATTITUDE ON ABORTION – POINT TAKEN.
FROM THE HUFF POST: –
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/21/rachel-maddow-todd-akin_n_1817753.html
[...] Todd Akin was on a broadcast and was being interviewed on the question of abortion. American conservatives have been pushing the notion of “personhood” for zygotes, female eggs just fertilized by male sperm and beginning cellular division. The Republican Party, including elected members of congress like Akin, is promoting personhood amendments on statewide election ballots. Not only do they want full human rights for a conglomeration of cells, Akin’s party wants to eliminate abortion for any reason, including rape, incest, or the life of the mother being at risk. [...]
TODD AKIN AKS FORGIVENESS
THE DAILY BEAST TV
http://www.thedailybeast.com/videos/2012/08/21/akin-i-ask-for-your-forgiveness.html
Hi Tess,
you said: “one of the spin offs about AKIN’s pathetic comment is that others in the electoral frontline have been forced to reveal where they stand on his disgraceful attitude.
And it’s likely that those who share similar views to him will shut up and/or mask their real attitude. Either way it’s scarey.”
While absolutely true, the whole focus on whether people and Republican candidates think his ideas are insane or not is skirting the crux of the matter. As you acknowledge, one can simply mask their view on that matter. However, the abortion bill, which is what Akin was trying to defned with his comments, is Republican party policy, and has been so for the better part of a decade. That is a fact they can not run away from if questioned. And while they may disagree with Akins views, it begs the question, if this is official party policy, then how does each candidate justify it to themselves and others? I can’t think of any way they could attempt to argue it without falling back to reciting bible passages.
Dear MATT, just revisiting the issue again, in view of other comments made by other candidates – and saw your comment – the issue of abortion is a contentious one – all over the world – and certainly in Australia as well.
OH, SO NOW YOUR ‘GOD’ IS A CO-CONSPIRATOR TO RAPE, MR MOURDOCK ?
‘Indiana Republican Senate candidate Richard Mourdock has said that pregnancy caused by rape is something “God intended” and not a situation that justifies an abortion, roiling a tight race less than two weeks before the election.
Mr Mourdock’s comment came in response to a voter-submitted question toward the end of a debate on Tuesday night with his opponents, Democratic US Representative Joe Donnelly and Libertarian candidate Andrew Horning.
“I’ve struggled with it myself for a long time, but I came to realise that life is that gift from God,” said Mr Mourdock, the state’s treasurer. “And, I think, even when life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen.”
Republican Richard Mourdock participates in a debate with Democrat Joe Donnelly and Libertarian Andrew Horning.
Mr Mourdock, who described his position on abortion as believing that “life begins at conception,” made his remark two months after Missouri Senate Republican candidate Todd Akin said that “legitimate rape” rarely leads to pregnancy.’
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/world/republican-candidate-says-pregnancy-from-rape-intended-by-god-20121024-2863o.html#ixzz2AHVKDurX
WAIT, THERE’S MORE – CNN REPORTS WOMEN VOTE ACCORDING TO MENSTRUAL CYCLE!
‘It’s the media equivalent of a Tony Abbott clanger, but this time it’s CNN – and instead of Julia Gillard, the wrath comes from, well, potentially every American female.
In an eyebrow-raising about-turn, the corporation published, then retracted, a news story that claimed that women’s votes were governed by their menstrual cycles, triggering an avalanche of criticism.
Based on unpublished research, the news piece stated that a woman’s voting behaviour was affected by whether she was ovulating on election day.’
Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/life/online-outrage-prompts-cnn-to-pull-story-linking-female-voting-to-ovulation-20121025-287rq.html#ixzz2AJ2Y3HXM