THE HAPPY LAND
Was John Howard’s Australia the place admirers like Tony Abbott promote? ‘The Happy Land’ is Graham Jackson‘s satirical alternative reality. This challenging work, illustrated by Gee, consists of thirteen Papers written by the major players in a dark period in Australia’s short history. IA will be publishing all of them over the next two weeks.
The Life and Times of John Winston Coward
The Prime Minister who pushed Children Overboard in His Pursuit of Electoral Victory: A Reconstruction
Contents
1: ‘His Scottish Ancestors’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
2: ‘His Love of Cricket’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
3: ‘My Mum and Dad’ – John Winston Coward
4: ‘The Happy Land’ – Extracts from an Interview with ‘Opening Batsman’
5: ‘The Coming of the Iraqis, Afghans and Fins’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
6: ‘The Martyrdom of Minister Reith’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
7: ‘My Dream’ – a Transcript of ‘Sea Captain’s’ Evidence before a Select Committee
8: ‘An Address to the Australian People’ – John Winston Coward
9: ‘Ruddock Replaces Reith’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
10: ‘His Favourite Sayings’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
11: ‘The Unveiling of the Scottish Thistle’ – John Winston Coward
12: ‘The Death of a Conservative Leader’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
13: ‘Postscript’ – ‘Wicketkeeper’
Paper 1: ‘His Scottish Ancestors’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello
As a child, John Winston Coward, the future Prime Minister of Australia, was gratified his ancestors came from the north. His parents were Wimmera wheat farmers and early in their youngest son’s life became an embarrassment. In order to block them out of his view of the world, which was affected by his shortness of vision and height, he retreated to an alternative reality in which his family were northern tribesmen who could pronounce the letter s. Southern tribes had trouble with the letter. He spent hours speculating on the significance of s. He had a bolt hole under a sheet of corrugated iron near the bag shed. There were few private places on the farm, but no one came near the shed, which was infested with mice and smelt of shit. For years his brothers and sisters called him mouse dropping, but because of the impediment in their speech it sounded like mouth dropping. To the extent that he allowed himself to be amused by anything, John Winston Coward was amused by this. He hadn’t inherited the disability, which meant he was a true heir of his ancestors.
In the reality he invented, he was the son of a Scottish chieftain who sent his only child south in a time of upheaval. Far to the north, the lands of the Scottish tribes were being invaded by barbarians seeking asylum. They arrived in small boats, on a wing and a prayer, bringing women and children. They brought no arms. It could be said that they threatened by sheer persistence, for whenever one of their boats vanished from sight the keen eyes of a northern tribesman would pick up the wake of another. And if the sentries saw nothing, they heard rumours of sightings, disappearances and landings further down the coast. There was never an end to their coming.
Like the keel of an upturned vessel, the sheet of rusty iron protected John Winston Coward as he lived out his reality amongst the refuse of rodents. He manoeuvred the large droppings as if they were barbarian boats tossing on distant seas and around them he placed small droppings, the seekers of asylum. They were so vile he could imagine them throwing their children overboard, to improve their own chance of survival.
He frowned in his stinking bolt hole. No one dared come near him. It might have been at this moment he had his first political thought — that if you smell bad enough no one comes near you. It was his first lesson in government.
He learned to read early. Whenever he was favoured by the light and weather, he took books out to his hole and learned how his ancestors first came to Australia and found it uninhabited, except for Indigenous people. At first the ancestors felt kindly towards them, then impatient and intolerant, as John Winston Coward became later. It was enough that one should be devoted to the study of one’s ancestors, without also having to take on Indigenous Australians — lost, stolen, or strayed. He drew a line in the sand to mark their departure to a remote place in the middle of the continent. When one of his sisters poked her head under the iron, he told her she could piss off too.
Because he grew slowly, many years passed before he left his iron shelter behind, and the idea of bunkering down became part of his thinking. His Scottish ancestors had invented a game called golf, in which bunkers were used. They were at once hazards and comfort zones at which the best players aimed in a tight situation. Although the game never appealed to him as cricket later did, he learned its lessons. The word bunker entered his vocabulary.
At much the same time one of his sisters fought her way into his bunker. He tried to repel her with a volley of dung, but she was so persistent he had to make room for her.
“What do you do here?” she asked.
“Sink ships,” he said, “sink them with spit.”
He demonstrated on the invaders at his feet.
“Why do you use so many s words?”
“Because it’s the most important letter.”
She believed him. Their parents often spoke of her brother’s intelligence. As the Wimmera sun beat down on the corrugated iron, she wondered if heat had anything to do with it; if her brother could think of things no one else could because his brain was on fire. She touched the hot iron with the tips of her fingers. For the first time she noticed the perspiration running down her brother’s face, before it splashed in the northern sea. The surface exploded with the violence of the impact, rocking the fragile dung boats, but it might have been her head starting to swim. None of the asylum-seekers were still swimming. They seemed to have drowned.
Scottish chieftains stood high on a cliff overlooking the carnage. One had a face like John Winston Coward’s and was clearly his imaginary father. Squinting in the sea-spray, he asked those around him what they could see. While some saw one thing and others saw another – and those with seafaring experience saw nothing at all – they were all caught up in the excitement.
Then the boy swept it all away with his hand.
“Why did you do that?” his sister asked.
“I like to smooth things over,” he replied, “pretend they were never there.”
She nodded as he patted down a circle of sand.
“That’s the same as lying,” she lisped.
He ignored her and wrote on the sand with the pointed end of a stick.
“What does that say?”
“Youngblood… The name of my ancestor.”
“You’d need another one to make a baby,” she said. “You could call her Fullblood.”
He stared at this curious sister through bloodshot eyes. The heat in the hole was intense and his eyes were red with perspiration rubbed in with his dirty hand. He had muddy patches on his shorts where drops had fallen from the end of his nose. His whole appearance was stunted, from his moon-like face down to his toes. When he walked he gave the impression he might topple forward, as if his toes were too short to get a grip on the earth.
His sister stared back. “You could be Halfblood,” she said. “Or Halfpint.”
“Some of the kids call me a halfwit,” he said, doodling in the sand. “They say I suck up to the teachers.”
“You’re the brainy one,” she explained.
He didn’t know what to do with her sympathy. It made him uneasy, as if his sister were getting inside his body. It was almost as bad as physical contact. His mind shied away and he began to feel sick.
He rubbed out Youngblood and drew a large S in the sand.
She backed out of the shelter.
“Mum’s calling,” she said.
It was the closest John Winston Coward ever got to his brothers and sisters. Resuming his inquiry into his ancestors, he wrote a list of significant s words, beginning with Scottish and sporran – which he’d recently looked up in his father’s dictionary – and ending with sneaky and superior. Shrouded with secrecy appealed to him, too, like sleight of hand and smoke-screen. Insincere and dissemble were honorary s words. Sophism he came to appreciate later, when he had to persuade the People that it was important to kill asylum-seekers on their native soil, before they had a chance to set sail for Australia.
Father and son consulted the dictionary together. The farmer looked up the meanings of words he wanted to use at local religious and political meetings, while his son soaked up knowledge as readily as the asylum-seekers’ boats soaked up the sea before sinking.
From his bunker, John Winston Coward had a vision of future events. He had a great destiny in the cycle of history. It began with brave Scots risking everything to come to an unknown, uninhabited land. And it would end when John Winston Coward stood on a high place, like the father of his imagination, and led the resistance to another invader. There would always be asylum-seekers, he realised. Look! There, and there! The boy gathered up mouse droppings and arranged them in international waters. He sneered at them.
He spat on them. He called the men spew-spawn, the women sluts. Their children were shits and had to be thrown overboard. Gathering up more droppings, he hurled them down at the tossing boats, like a wrathful God. The one true God was a vengeful God. The sermons his father preached told him so. This God could search out any secret, however deeply it was buried. The boy wondered if he should put Him to the test.
He gathered a mouthful of saliva. It was the most effective way of turning back the invader. The sheet of iron was too close to the ground to let him stand and take aim, but by sitting cross-legged he could line up the enemy and let him have it. As the spit bomb left his mouth, he watched it fall in slow motion on the frantic boats. They had nowhere to hide. Between Christmas Island and the Australian coast, the ocean was vast and empty. The bomb would engulf several boats at once, if they clung together for support. As the explosion of the sea’s surface settled far below, he could see people struggling and sinking.
Wiping the dribble from his chin, the boy wondered what secret he could bury so deep God wouldn’t find it. Again he saw the vision of a Scottish chieftain surveying the sea’s wreckage. Again he saw himself leading his People against their foes—against, perhaps, the dictates of destiny, of God. Might that be his secret? That he’d rule forever, even against the wishes of his People, if that was what the future should bring? A formidable secret! He’d dare God to discover it, and lay him low!
He smoothed the sand.
“Mum’s calling,” he said.
He wrote a large S in the sand, for Secret. He was only a boy, after all. His hands were dirty and would have to be washed before dinner. He smelt strongly of mice. He rolled some of their droppings around in the palm of his hand. Some were so big they might have come from rats, or sheep. But there were no sheep left on his father’s Wimmera acres, only wheat, in a good season, and the mice. At times they became a plague, so the ground around the bag shed was alive with them, scurrying this way and that like seekers of asylum. John Winston Coward had to chase them out of his bunker with a stick. But it was all good training and in time these early experiences would make a significant contribution to his success as a conservative leader.








7 Comments
I find this all very insulting to rodents all over the world.
John Winston Howard, like all Australian prime ministers, leaves a mixed legacy. His lowest point, IMO, was the children overboard affair, one that will ever leave a stain on his stewardship.
Iraq? I will reserve judgment on that for some more years and then I will judge that by the society that Iraq has become and I will be more interested in the judgement of the Iraqi people than comofortable, middle class Australian commentators.
Howard took on some on his own side of politics – especially the Nationals – when he introduced gun control (hardly a cowardly act). His interevention in East Timor stands in stark contrast to that of Hawke – who, on the matter of Vietnamese refugees was rather wishy washy. He refused to seek endorsement for a safer seat than Benelong. And he sought a mandate for the GST, which is more than can be said for the current encumbent who, in a desparate grab for power backflipped on her mandate only days after the election.
And John Winston Howard had a hearing impairment which left him with a light speach impediment. As a child I had a bit of an accent which my peers saw as odd and I was given a nick name that I hated. It hurt.
There are scores of children which are hurt every day all over the country by those that pick on their differences and many of these remain scared for life. Psychological bullying is something every responsible adult needs to work at erasing from our society.
By all means, critically analyse Howard’s legacy. But this crap?
‘… shortness of vision and height … impediment in their speach …’.
Regarding this purile, base peice of rubbish coward is a word that comes to mind, but not in relation to John Winston Howard.
Ken, it’s satire, and Howard was a vile PM.
And how nice of you to think you have the right to decide in some years time that the illegal and murderous invasion of Iraq was OK if the society turns out OK in some years time.
That is the sort of racist nationalism that drives me to insanity.
well ken marsh..
i personally..don’t believe..
your UN-educated,ideologically driven..
neo-con/fascist http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fascism….
greed focused apologist drivel..
everyone knows the great myth was a lie…
little Johnnie coward could not bat,bowl or field..
he bowled underarm…http://www.redrag.net/2004/08/23/truth-overboard-27-lies-told-by-john-howard-and-counting/…
to me you are an apologist for an individual.. that in any..
other time and place..would be the subject of a full judicial..
inquiry.. the evidence is over-whelming and real..http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/…
for a man who could hardly ‘play the game’..he sure is responsible,for a hell of a lot of killing,all for oil. PERHAPS YOU AND COWARD CAN ASK THE GHOSTS OF ALL THE DEAD..HOW THEY FEEL ABOUT IT ALL ..IN A FEW YEARS!
people like ken marsh try too ..rationalize and justify ..
the most outrageous things..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z81RVshnjAU…bush,blair and Little Johnnie Coward..
traitors and war criminals …
No impediment,critically Ken..its how you play the game. whoops its all about OIL AGAIN Ken…http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/jun2006/etim-j06.shtml…more pork pies from your…
little Johnnie coward.
critically yours Ken.
1. There is very little in this world that I see in terms of black and white. Because of that I had questions at the time and still do re. Iraq. But to pretend that Hussein was anything more than a nasty bit of work who thought nothing of murder and torture to protect his self-interest is to be totally blind to reality. And as for your comments MarilynS re ‘racist nationalism’, there are men and women in this world who believe that freedom is worth dying for, including Iraqis. And, if in 20 years time the people of Iraq live in a free and democratic country and they celebrate the invasion as the start of all that, I will value their view much more highly than I value yours.
2. I have high respect for many who disagree with me. In fact, I often value their comments more than those who agree with me because it is in the testing of ideas that one learns and grows. Those who stoop to name calling and character attacks demonstrate to me that they either have closed minds, fail to appreciate the complexity of the argument, or lack the intellectual ability – or are too intellectually lazy – to argue their positions.
3. One can objectively analyse Howard – his strenghts and weaknesses, achiements and failures without the perjorative base nonsense above. And if you read what I have said above you will note that I have not attempted to anlayse or express opionions on much of what he did and did not do.
4. Julia, it seems, is out of bounds so far as this so-called ‘satirical’ stuff goes. I for one have never called her – and never will – Juliar or commented on the size of her posterior – though I admit that at times I have referred to Princess Ranga and the Mad Monk (even called him Rasputin once or twice). I would never however use the ‘hyocriscy’ word in terms of it being OK to have a go at one whose politics you don’t agree with and criticise those on the other side who return the favour.
5. At different times in my life I have voted Liberal, Labour, Democrat and Green. I admire David Suzuki and John Pilger and in 07 I voted Labour – but not for Rudd who has never appealed to me but because I though he had a great deputy.
6. And frankly, I see little difference between ‘… shortness of vision and height … impediment in their speach …’ (whether it passes as satire or not) and the names kids – including myself – have and continue to get called in the playground. Satire that seeks to deliberately denigrate another is offensive and is part of the world that we should be leaving behind.
[...] ‘His Scottish Ancestors’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello 2: ‘His Love of Cricket’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello 3: ‘My Mum and Dad’ [...]
Ken – Yes Hussein was a despot, however, Howard initially insisted that the invasion was not about regime change that it was about WMD. POLITICIANS BELIEVE THAT FREEDOM IS WORTH DYING FOR FREEDOM IS WORTH LIVING FOR.
Lawrie, I used the line ‘freedom is worth dying for’ because I clearly recall the statement made by an Iraqi citizen lining up to vote after the invasion in the face of threats by terroists to carry out their evil intent against those that chose to stop the elections. It is also a statement I have heard reflected in some of the other uprisings in the Middle East of late – though I have also heard that one driver of that is food shortage.
One question I have goes something like this. When Hussein (who represented a minority in Iraq and ruled with a reign of terror over the majority) went into Suadi Arabia in 1990 (circa) he was deemed to have carried out an act of aggression against another nation and so when Bush – supported by Hawke – responded that was seen as a legal action.
The Kurds, as I have heard reported, responded and sided with the allies. Unfortunately for the Kurds Bush Snr didn’t do the job properly, which unleased the wrath of Hussein on the Kurds. It seems no one gave a stuff.
The Byzantines ruled this part of the world for centuries, knowing that all these people groups basically hated each other but kept them reasonably happy by establishing a system of government that gave them some form of regional automony. When the West split the Middle East up Churchil drew a few lines on a map, totally disregarded the advice of his advisors and at the same time the various people groups, and set up regimes that he felt would look after the interests of England.
I accept the fact of the lies of Howard and Bush and WMDs. I don’t rule out the oil factor – which no doubt was on Husseins mind in 1990 as well. And their intention to get rid of Hussein may not have had one pure motive at all.
The Kurds have been screwed by the West. They were betrayed again in 1990. Because they are not a nation any invasion of Iraq that led to their liberation would be an illegal act because of artificial lines on a map.
Two wrongs do not make a right. But if the illegal, immoral invastion of Iraq makes things a whole lot better for the Kurds, is it totally immoral?
And I must admit that I don’t know the fallout of this so far as the Kurds go.
[...] ‘His Scottish Ancestors’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello [...]
[...] ‘His Scottish Ancestors’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello 2: ‘His Love of Cricket’ – Emeritus Professor P. Costello 3: ‘My Mum and Dad’ – John [...]