Victoria Rollison says her disillusionment with Australian media has caused her to turn away from mainstream sources and seek out independent views — including IA.
Anyone who follows me on Twitter will notice that I spend a lot of time bemoaning the disgraceful news coverage offered to us by Australian mass media. #MediaFail is probably my most used hash tag. In recent months, my disillusionment with Australian media has caused me to turn away from my old staple diet of Fairfax and ABC, and has led me to seek out independent views.
Happily, this independent coverage is growing in quality and quantity.
I now read Independent Australia on a daily basis and I also enjoy the amalgamation of quality blogs on The Political Sword. The Conversation is a great place to find critical analysis of topics from politics, to education, to environment, all provided by Australian academics. It has even got to a point where these blogs aren’t just commenting on news that is reported in mainstream media, but are also publishing exclusives. For instance, investigative blogger Peter Wicks, creator of Wixxy Leaks, has contributed thousands of words to Independent Australia, uncovering the scandal that is Kathy Jackson. That’s right. Kathy Jackson is the scandal. Not Craig Thomson. Thomson’s spending on his union credit card is insignificant compared to the scam Kathy and her friends have been running at the Health Services Union for many years. Have you heard about this in mainstream media? Of course you haven’t. Because they have jumped the shark.
The phrase ‘Jumped the Shark’, for those unfamiliar, is “the moment in its evolution when a brand, design, or creative effort moves beyond the essential qualities that initially defined its success, beyond relevance or recovery”. (You can read about the origins of the phrase at Wikipedia). Using the example of the three dominant news press suppliers in Australia – News Ltd, Fairfax and ABC – there’s an obvious reason why these organisations find themselves beyond relevance or recovery. They are completely myopic when it comes to criticising their colleagues in the industry — or critically analysing their own influence on the news they are reporting.
For example, have you ever heard anyone in the mainstream press lament the role of their own colleagues in encouraging Tony Abbott’s negativity to infect consumer confidence to a point where the best performing economy in the world is seen by those within it as a basket case? Sure, there are a few brave souls willing to say that Tony Abbott’s relentless negativity – along with the way the press reports this negativity – is having a detrimental effect on economic confidence. But have you ever heard specifics? Have you ever seen Fairfax’s Peter Hartcher say:
“It’s quite clear that Michelle Grattan is hell bent on perpetuating a rumour that there are leadership tensions in the Labor Party, and though this isn’t the case, Grattan is quite clearly doing this to undermine confidence in Gillard, to the benefit of Tony Abbott.”
This sort of commentary just doesn’t happen. And it doesn’t happen because the ‘in club’ of journalists and management in mainstream media are terrified of stepping outside their own party line and exposing the elephant in the room.
Here’s another example, again using Peter Hartcher from Fairfax. This article from last Friday’s Sydney Morning Herald is actually quite a good one. In it, Hartcher’s basic argument is that Gillard should give up on her Carbon Price Household Assistance Package because Australians have a sense of entitlement so large, they’re never going to be happy with handouts, because they’ll never feel like it’s enough. Very true. Hartcher makes the oft-made comparison of government payments being treated like a bottomless ‘Magic Pudding’. He then goes on to say:
“Somewhere along the way, many seem to have lost sight of the fact that the magic pudding was a fairytale. Australians seem to have taken it as a principle of fiscal management.”
This is a complete cop out. Somewhere along the way?
How about Hartcher try this instead:
“Australian voters form most of their political opinions by consuming political news from mainstream media, and messages from our political leaders are reported to the public through a very tightly controlled mass media funnel. The sense of entitlement prevalent in our society has very much been fuelled and fanned by the mainstream media, of which I am a member”.
Hartcher isn’t going to say that though. And he’s never going to criticise Michelle Grattan, his other Fairfax colleagues or any journalist who works for Fairfax’s commercial competitors. They all belong to the ‘in club’ — an impenetrable fortress devoid of self-critique.
Has anyone read anything in relation to Kathy Jackson in the mass media that comes anywhere close to suggesting that she is far dodgier in her HSU dealings than Craig Thomson was — and that the mass media have done a disservice to the public of Australia for not uncovering this months ago?
It’s not hard to see why people like me are increasingly seeking out, and happily finding, independent commentary that isn’t afraid to report news, free of the shackles of phrases like “somewhere along the way”. I look forward to watching this trend continue.
(This piece was originally published on Victoria Rollison’s blog www.victoriarollison.com.)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License









17 Comments
Dear Victoria
an example of the failure of the MSM to do their job is the way they participated in & embellished the LNP hyperbole in relation to the so-called ‘cash splash’ where in fact money was wasted – a small percentage – and our economy was saved. A first -class use of Keynesian economics, which work now as it did in the Great Depression. Unexplained by the commentariat and thus not generally understood.
The offspring of this misinformation of the Australian people is the number in yesterday’s Essential poll wherein 26% of those polled trusted Labor to run the economy and 40% trusted the Opposition. Good grief!
Grattan is in her dotage, but Coorey and Hartcher know what they are doing. I feel very little sympathy for Fairfax in it s present state.
Ufortunately the numbers reading Ai are tiny in comparison to those reading the ‘Telegraph’, for example.
Its just possible this may change. Like you I read AI daily = and thanks for providing me with new blogs. Lots of yanks are turning to the “Lehrer Report’, I gather. Or even to John Stewart.
Victoria
Even fairfax journalist Katherine Murphy realised the Abbott team had “jumped the shark” on the Carbon Tax, when she was appalled that Brandis in the Senate, equated Fiarfax job losses with the Carbon Tax. Well boo hoo Murphy, Fairfax journalists have let Abbott get away with these absurb assumptions, so why should it matter now when it applies to your industry.
I’ve never really read the Daily Telegraph – did it once and felt my IQ plummet by the 2nd page.
We’ve now ditched SMH, the paper who broke the story on Craig Thomson yet seems totally incapable of reporting anything that is similar to what you see here on IA.
If you post a comment on SMH pointing this fact out, they reject it. If you so much as mention IA, they reject it.
It is concerning the way things are going.
If it’s bad now, can you imagine what it will look like if Gina Rinehart gets her way with three seats on the Fairfax Board, including the Deputy Chair AND the right to “make significant editorial decisions” which translates as hire & fire the Editors she wants.
“the Fairfax board should have the right to change the editorial direction of the company if it would increase profit” and “Gina Rinehart would have a stronger right-wing view than probably the average liberal journalist.” ….. Jack Cowin
The future doesn’t look good for a free & independent mainstream press in Australia … these are truly troubling times & will hand political power to a non elected cartel of business interests.
Fairfax are doomed if Gina gets here way as Mr Cowin’s claim demonstrates. He may know how to sell Hungry Jack’s chips but that doesn’t make you an Einstein in business.
This is an excellent analysis by Victoria and the future is not bright for many journos. It’s their own fault (by the way- I gave up on Hartcher when he confidently predicted Rudd would not win in ’07)
The laziness of the MSM has been shocking- the way they have lazily allowed Tony Abbott to drive the debate and the endless “Labor are not selling the message” is a disgrace but works against them as well.
The other great conundrum : publications have forgotten the great swathe of the so-called “doctor’s wives” in Melbourne & Sydney (and their hubbies). These are people who vote for conservatives purely for their own financial reasons even though they may despise some policies. They demonstrated this over the attacks on refugees.
They are the ones who dislike Tony Abbott’s crude attacks on Julia Gillard and who want to know about her policies and how they will affect us. They don’t get it now from Fairfax and never will from news Corp.
One thing we can hope comes from Gina getting her positions on the board of Fairfax – hopefully it’ll cause many more people to start seeking alternate news sources (like IA!).
As the HMAS SMH begins to sink it prints its code of ethics:
“Our editorial management shall be conducted upon principles of candour, honesty and honour. We have no wish to mislead; no interest to gratify by unsparing abuse or indiscriminate approbation. The Sydney Morning Herald, April 18, 1831.
These values, set out in the Herald’s first editorial, have guided the paper for more than 180 years. Our most valuable asset is our integrity, and it is this that the code is designed to protect.”
Glory, Glory! Hallelujah!
Glory, Glory! Hallelujah!
Glory, Glory! Hallelujah!
Its soul is marching on
The Press has got worse since the 11 long years of the Howard government.
They ruled by press release. Always teling everyone how good we are.
I think that that was the last time that they ever decided to get off their bar stools and do any real work.
The reality was they were a shocking Government. Everyone is talking about the cost of Living. When Howard came to Power in 1996 the proportion of Average wages spend on the mortgage was 30%. By giving away stupid free largess to first home buyers it made the price of houses jump by 60% in some places. The Proportion of Average wages spent on the Mortgage in 2006 was 50%.
HALF of what the average person earned. During that time Wages kept place with inflation. The result. More people unable to afford a House and more Mortgage stress. More people in the don’t have bracket because they are priced out of the market.
Unfortunaterly labor followed suit in the States. A silly move. Now I see the NSW Liberals are carrying on with the same policy. Madness.
Contrast the Stimulus of the Rudd Gillard era. The stimulus kept people in work and kept the money flowing through the economy.
The greatest problem a good Government has faced has been the absolute vitriol about them in the Press. The MSM and the Lib Nats have banded together to create a story (a ficticious one) that paints the Labor party in the worst possible light.
If we wan to have a look at the shape of an Abbott Government then need to look back at the Scandals of the last Howard Government. I have counted them. I am up to about 40 so far. Thats about 4 a year.
Need a reminder.
Cornelia Rau, Vivien Solon, Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, Mohammed Haneef, Mamdouh Habib Torutre, Children overboard, 6 Ministers resigned over Ministerial Code of conduct breaches.
And then the Lies of the Present Coalition.
1/ We got more votes in the 2010 election …. WRONG … have a look at he Australian Electoral Commission web site.
2/ The Government will have to find $113 billion to fund the Gonski proposals ove rthe next 12 years…… WRONG…. bad maths if you take their assumptions (PYNE and ABBOTT) the actual figure is $100 Billion and Can’t read the report. The Federal Governments portion is #0% of the $5 billion the report mentions. So over the next 12 years the actual proportion is $30 billion not $113. Simple Maths and reading ability. Ironic as the report is about better Literacy and Numeracy.
3/ The Lies about the carbon price in 2050. THE IDIOTS DIDN’T READ THE ACT EITHER. THE PRICE IS A PRICE UNTIL 2015 AND THEN IT BECOMES A MARKET BASED CAP AND TRADE SCHEME.
So the mainstream media are complicit in their misrepresentation of this sort of stuff. Perhaps that is why they are outsourcing all their editors to New Zealand!
The same was true of the people who died whilst installing home insulation. The people responsible for cccupational health and safety are the firms actually doing the work. Not the Minister in charge.
This sort of ferral misrepresentation is an offense against democracy.
The same is true of the Kathy Jackson and Peter Slipper affairs. haven’t the Liberals gone quiet on these things now.
Peter Wicks has done a marvellous job of actually unveiling the true facts of the HSU. At every step of the way he has provided his evidence. It is voluminous. For anyone to suggest that there would be an attempt at forging these documents is ludicrous.
And you know what he has done it all in just over a Month.
Hats off to Independent Australia and Peter Wicks.
David have you had a call from Gina Yet? She would do well to invest her $400 million in a real purveyor of genuine information than a bullshit machine.
I rest my case.
Today the awful Daniel Flitton, former spook, has regurgitated a press release from the UNHCR pointing out that more people than ever have been forced to leave their homes due to wars and strife.
In the AGE he blames the people smugglers for the whole damn thing and thinks we should jump that shark and shove refugees away.
the old punish the victims routine in the name of punishing everyone but the murderers and rapists who force people to flee.
Thank you all for your interesting comments. Seems we are all on the same page.
Cheers.
Cracker, you are absolutely right on all points and I have also argued the same points many times, finding it incredible that people would rather put their minds in neutral and just believe the spin that they are being sold by the MSM.
I have had many discussions about the so called failed insulation scheme, explaining to people that the ones responsible are the unscrupulous employers who employed untrained workers to install insulation, most of whom were more than happy to make lots of money from the scheme.
The irony being that although the LNP were the ones screaming to the rooftops about the “Government waste”, and the MSM were quick to echo the call, not one of them mentioned the fact that most of the afore mentioned unscrupulous employers, who were the real culprits were, if not paid up members, at the very least LNP supporters as most small business owners/ operators are.
And despite their calls for legal action against the Government, only a few employers, not the Government, have been charged.
As far as Gina is concerned, I think she, like Richo, is suffering from relevance depravation syndrome, as although she is horribly rich, (some would say obscenely so, at the expense of her own children) the only way that she can get her radically right wing and self serving views out there is to buy herself a voice. It’s the same reason that the communists, dictators and military rulers take control of the media before they do anything else. Propaganda!
They all understand the power of the media in the wrong hands.
A bit like we have now really, even without Gina!
It must be really hard for her, being so rich and yet so irrelevant!
Poor Gina.
Thanks Steve, I have been doing the same. I wrote to Barnaby Joyce and asked him to retract his business about getting more votes in the 2010 Election by press release. Need less to say he didn’t do it and I didn’t get a reply. but what I did do was send a copy to all the email people I have at the ABC, so that they could see it was a lie. Including news24, QandA and lateline. I didn’t get a reply from them either.
As Tony Jones is so intent on correcting people all the time i thouight he should also know the actual truth of the matter.
With the ructions at Fairfax and the spin of the Murdoch press and the demise of the ABC as a credible news source. I absolutely think that Independent Australia has filled a huge gap in the reporting of mainstream stories and basically the truth.
After trying to discredit Peter Wicks a couple of weeks ago, Crikey has now changed its tune. Have alook at this article
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/purepoison/2012/06/19/actually-the-craig-thomson-beat-up-is-exactly-the-sort-of-political-up-skirting-thats-turning-those-wanting-quality-journalism-off-the-old-mastheads/
Seems like they are trying to regain some of the ground they have lost. Just goes to show it never profits to spin things just tell the two sides of the story and let the public make up their minds.
The prospect of having a Gina controlled Media empire makes me sick. It is obscene that anyone owns as much as she does. Which poses the question “How much do people really need?” How many cars or houses or aeroplanes or helicopters do we need to have. You can only live in one house at a time, drive one car and fly one aircraft. The rest is just greed. WRIT Large.
I tell you what you can do with lots of Money though. BUY a newspaper and a TV station and then control what us plebs hear aznd read. Thats really scary stuff.
Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Looks like we might be heading into this Territory.
Same in politics. Liberals not concentrating on the growth of the country but on the destruction of the Government, so they have Power and control for a small minority of neo conservatives.
Wake up Australia.
It brings joy to my heart to read everyone’s comments. It is so frustrating when you reach your senior years and think that your voice can’t be heard. I feel so grateful to IA for their wonderful work and also to all of you who feel strongly enough about your viewpoints to make your comments. Keep up the good work folks.
Lets consider two Policies which are in the News daily and the subject of some controversy.
The first is climate change. I would like to ask the question. “To what extent is this debate about the climate changing?”
One only has to look at the people who own the present Electricity generation. It fulfills two Economic criteria. The first is that there is an abundant (Victoria Gippsland) supply of easily and cheaply mined Brown coal. The second is that the original infrastructure was bought for a song and it had been built to exacting standards by the State.
What is the alternative. The wind and the sun. Both of them are free and anyone can have access to them.
So the proposed model is one where the existing owners of the Electricity supply have to invest Billions to adapt the technology to their existing plant.
Their cash cow just became a not so great cash cow.
So the Answer. Deny Climate change and it may go away. Lets make up a story, pay people lots of money to tell the story and we will continue to have a cash cow.
The second Policy is the Mining tax.
What we have is mining companies digging up Australian owned resources and making lots of money out of them. All they do is dig them up out of the ground and then sent them overseas to be made into the metals which are contained within them. The people overseas realise that these are valuable metals and they are probably more valuable than we think.
All the processing is done overseas. There is no value adding done in Australia. Guess what though its another cash Cow for the miners.
Along come this Government and say. Hold on we need to spread a bit of this wealth around the Australian Economy, rather than just watch the money go into the pockets of the miners.
Lets have a bit of a Tax so that EVERYONE CAN BENEFIT. Afterall it is a Cash cow! Its an Australian cash Cow.
Squirm, bleat and moan about how unfair it is.
Well mining companies, look at the way to mine the stuff here and then refine it here and then sell it overseas at even greater profits. At the same time giving people jobs and respect here in Australia.
These are the realities of two issues. They are my opinion but you will never see this opinion in an op ed.
The main Stream Media do little research, are badly motivated, have small minds and zero intellect. They reflect their owners.
Cracker, thanks for the link to crikey.
I haven’t seen much on there lately worth reading, but to give them their due, they did allow a number of comments that are pretty scathing of their own site and also some paying complements to Wixxy and IA, maybe things are starting to turn around out there.
[...] THE Sunday before last, I wrote a piece about the mainstream media jumping the shark. [...]