Former MP Denise Allen believes the mainstream media are so hell-bent on regime change, they are not applying proper scrutiny to the policies of Tony Abbott and the Opposition.
Someone (me) once wrote:
“It is incumbent on professional journalists to write fair and balanced opinion and provide such meticulous, factual information outlining both sides of a story as to allow the reader to make up their own minds accordingly”.
Today’s 24 hour media cycle has completely thrown professional scribing by many mainstream journalists out the window — including those new to the profession and, increasingly, the old school.
Like jackals baying for blood, these neo-hacks ram their personal opinions down the throats of either the unsuspecting (often so aghast they are shell-shocked), or of the insatiable – the scandal hungry – devouring biased information as if it was their last meal.
Many Australians, however, expect much, much, more from the “old school” — many of whom have been respected and admired for years as reliable political journalists.
Alas, it now seems that 99 per cent of the time, the ‘news’ or commentary appears to be the journalist’s own personal opinion — often even according to their own political leanings.
The prime example of this deterioration in standards, is the recent diatribe directed at a sitting Prime Minister and Government? So much so, that the authors almost seem to be willingly complicit in aiding the Opposition in its attempts to bring down an elected Government merely on the strength of vindictive, acerbic personal opinions and commentary.
Undoubtedly this Government is distracted by the sideshows of Craig Thomson and the Speaker, Peter Slipper. But no one, especially the Opposition and the media, cared about either of these men’s past behavior until the Opposition leader apparently decided it was a pathway for him to seek his revenge for not being made PM in 2010.
An ABC journalist I once held in high regard recently interviewed the Prime Minister. Now I always enjoy a good hard-hitting interview, but this was more like schoolyard bullying; more like the now familiar modus operandi of a commercial shock jock than a highly professional ABC journalist. Regardless of your opinion of the PM, her role demands far more respect than that which has been afforded her.
I cannot remember a time when the mainstream media have been more in the gutter and more hateful than it is now — and they have the hide to disparage politicians for not being ‘honourable”.
Why don’t these mainstream “professional” journalists return to the ground breaking investigative journalism of past editions?
Why don’t the mainstream media follow up articles akin to the likes of Peter Wicks from IA and his in-depth articles on other players in the Thomson issue?
My answer, of course, is ‘I don’t know’. I can only assume they are either miffed at not “scooping” the story; or perhaps, more revealingly, they know that their media proprietors, editors, and powerful interests simply don’t want the public to embrace alternative agendas.
My father always taught me that if you weren’t there and didn’t see with your own eyes you are not in a position to judge. A very wise man, my Dad.
It is increasingly obvious, for example, that in order for Abbott to get his ‘revenge’, and the Opposition into Government – as these journalists so widely predict and so obviously want – that we are not allowed to read about what we should, might or will get?
Where is the in-depth analysis of the Opposition statements, tactics and policies; of the reasons why they will do whatever it is they want to do? Don’t we have a right to know about their agenda, so we can make up our own minds about Abbott and his cohort.
Instead we have the unedifying spectacle of a media deliberately depriving the people of that knowledge. By so doing, they knowingly lead the masses into ignorance. They usher them – mindless but willing, to elect an Abbott led Government hell bent on the gladiatorial destruction of the vulnerable, and the processes and standards of our Parliament.
A handful of media organisations, through their editors, journalists and commentators, have given Abbott a free ride. So they write about politicians not being honourable, or believable, and constantly accuse and denigrate them for ‘spinning’, when much of what is published is exactly that, whether presented in major newspapers, TV, twitter, or blogs.
They twist and edit a politician’s words — and deny us fair, balanced and factual information from both sides. They take to these forums with their own interpretations of an issue or statement as if it was gospel! As if they were God!
With their sarcastic – supposedly humorous – witty commentary, they take to the airways as if they themselves are so much better than everyone else.
What would happen if we turned the tables and started hounding them day in day out about their private and/or professional lives. I bet there would be litigation faster than you could say “Clive Palmer”!
What if the public demanded that media proprietors, and their associated vested interests, not just promise, but ensure, that editors, journalists and commentators are able to conduct themselves in a professional manner — without fear or favour.
A NOTE FROM THE EDITOR
This piece is the strong personal view of Denise Allen, a former MP, and may be seen as offensive by some in the mainstream media. It is, however, becoming an increasingly common view in society, as standards of public trust in the popular press plumbs new depths.
Independent Australia would like to make plain that we are not anti-journalist — mainstream of otherwise. In an increasingly confusing media landscape, we know that journalists are under siege in this country, and elsewhere, with job losses and outsourcing occurring on an ever increasing scale — and with individual journalists expected to be more productive with less resources – and thus more overworked – than ever before.
If you have a perspective on this issue – perhaps one radically different from the one expressed by Denise – then we would like to hear it and share it with IA readers. Without journalism, our democracy suffers, so let’s all stand in solidarity to support and keep this noble occupation strong and vibrant.
Editor (DD)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License









25 Comments
In effect, Australia’s got a two-party system but a one-party media. This state of affairs is a cancer that is bringing down one of the foundations of democracy – the capacity of competing political viewpoints to be heard in the public debate.
Former MP Denise Allen says Australia deserves a better mainstream #media. #AusPol #AusDem http://t.co/WCTjMBoF
I, like Denise have been appalled at the lack of ethics shown by the MSM over recent months, if not years.
The threat to our democracy by our abysmal media has mobilised many voters to look for alternative pathways to factual information – that is turning out to be a real eye opener!
It appears that the MSM is wilfully ignoring very relevant information for readers, we can only assume that their editorial policies formed by their boards/ownership has decided what information the population should be fed.
I am very glad that Twitter, Blogs and sites like this are now taking the fight up to the MSM.
Editor invites, “If you have a perspective on this issue – perhaps one radically different from the one expressed by Denise – then we would like to hear it and share it with IA readers. Without journalism, our democracy suffers, so let’s all stand in solidarity to support and keep this noble occupation strong and vibrant.”
Shall we see if he is true to his word?
In my view this piece is utter tripe. The MSM have pilloried Abbott at every turn. They have excused Labor’s atrocious government and blamed Abbott for the results. There is some grudging acceptance that Abbott will lead the coalition to a win at the next election, but they don’t accept that he should win on the strength of his policies. They are regurgitating Labor propaganda which has it that AbbottAbbottAbbott is an unelectable liability (and concur with IA, that Turnbull – a dripping wet liberal – would be wonderful, but just that they would never vote for him).
And just for the record, research has shown that the media is well to the left of even the Labor party, well to the left of any reflection of main stream views held by Australians, and that there are no MSM outlets that exist in Australia with a view that extends to a generally right-of-centre outlook.
Well Colin, they printed you,
I think they mean what they say, don’t you?
I have a theory : The Opposition knows the lightweight nature of today’s media aids them and they use the fact. An example is the ridiculous Utegate tale where commonsense told me that a PM worth a reputed personal fortune and with a wife worth ten times he, would not be involved in some alleged mis-use of an old truck.
Yet the mass media did not approach the story with a sceptical mind, they ran like hell with the fantasy.
Similar is happening with Craig Thomson. It’s like they are so blinded by wishing it to be true, they close their eyes to alarm bells.
Kate McClymont demonstrated this with her Twitter reply to the puzzling fact a credit card spelt a name incorrectly. Rather than see that as a clue to dig further, she simply compounded what seems an already made up mind.
The big difference here is that a government could fall on a fraud.
It tells you a lot when I speak to all my middle-class friends and they express no sympathy for the woes of Fairfax journalists in their current battles with management. 10 years ago they would have expressed solidarity.
Fascinating research Colin. Care to provide your source?
Colin, I would love to see or hear a coalition policy. As yet they have not delivered.
Denise, great article.
Colin, can I ask you just what planet you are living on at the moment, doesn’t seem like its planet earth to me.
I personally just want to see proper fair reporting in which truth, justice really matter. Surely this isn’t too much to expect.
Kilgore Shaft try these for starters.
Repeal carbon tax. Repeal mining tax. Paid maternity leave.
In fact, here’s a whole heap of them (that you may not find in the MSM or at this site).
http://www.liberal.org.au/Policies.aspx
Perhaps the reason you don’t “hear” coalition policies is that the media don’t want to focus on policies. They’d rather focus on polls and AbbottAbbottAbbott which the ALP have told them is the way to defeat HM’s Loyal Opposition.
And for sandra, I live in Australia.
We all want to see “proper fair reporting”. Truth is good, but the media don’t dispense “justice”. No, it’s not too much to expect, but you can be assured that many truths will be unpalatable to you (and me), so beware what you wish for.
McClymont got sucked in by the lying thief Kathy Jackson before she realised the woman is certifiable.
She is now simply incapable of backing off because it shows that Thomson would have won his defamation claim if he hadn’t listened to that fool Richo.
The MSM today though are still maintaining their invented lie that Thomson has been accused by someone of taking $500,000 from the HSU when no such claim has ever been made by anyone.
Nassios made the bogus claim that $270,000 was used with declaration to the AEC for his two election campaigns, it was all declared and legal.
Except for the $17,000 Jackson was late in filing.
The claim was the same old one of $100,000 on the union credit card which was all paid years ago and no-one has ever asked for.
Then we have $6,000 on prostitutes, half of which was the claim laid originally against Jeff Jackson.
The are cretins who refuse to think.
But some have reported that Thomson was collateral damage in the war between Fegan and the Jacksons.
It’s not hard to find the lies.
And another case of the Jackson’s setting someone up by claiming fraud is the old case of Jan Armstrong from 1998 which was also false.
Seems to me that everytime Kathy is called on to do some work she claims someone is stealing.
Oh dear, poor Colin.
OK, the carbon tax will not be repealed because it only lasts until 2014 and time will run out.
The mining tax will not be repealed because the opposition will love all that money.
The parental leave scheme is a bribe for millionaire mothers to stay home.
If that is all the liberal party stand for what precisely are you supporting?
As for the media being left wing – there are a couple of sets of bridges I would like to sell you to the Antarctic.
Colin, Cathy Jackson, the LNP and the MSM have all called CT delusional, but they are full of lies, half truths and deceit. According to your wildly imaginative statement about the media being rabid lefties, and that Abbot has policies one can only conclude that the truly delusional one is you.
If you believe everything that you wrote, then the Australia that you live in must be in a parallel universe, but don’t worry as the easter bunny and the tooth fairy will be around shortly to collect your brain as you are obviously not using it!
Colin, you claim the piece expressed is “utter tripe” and attempt to put an end to any doubt the MSM has been impartial with your conclusive evidence: “The MSM have pilloried Abbott at every turn”.
The definition of the word “pillory” is to expose, to ridicule and abuse.
You have to agree that Abbott has received at least equal media attention when compared to Julia Gilliard, and the Labor government as a whole, who has been admonished or picked apart from pillar to post since the election by the MSM. If Abbott’s equal media attention was, according to you, “at every turn” pillory then it has been of the most gentle manner that its consequence was soothing and actually encouraged him to continue with his belligerent hysteria to force an election solely to satiate his desire for power.
The nongs in the MSM must be scratching their heads wondering why their pillorying of Tony Abbott has turned him from a Rottweiler into a politician having the most kindly nature.
higgs boson worries about the government “who has been admonished or picked apart from pillar to post since the election by the MSM”. Well that’s their job. The government, after all, is the side with the power to act, not the opposition. In my view (and it seems, most Australians) the government deserves to lose the next election based on their performance.
So it is not just Abbott who has a “desire for power”. There are millions of us. I want the power to vote as soon as possible. Obviously Gillard doesn’t want me to do that because she knows what will happen. We live in a democracy, so politicians should never be afraid of the electorate who are their bosses.
And, yes, “The nongs in the MSM must be scratching their heads wondering why their pillorying of Tony Abbott has turned him from a Rottweiler into a politician having the most kindly nature.” For the most part the nongs in the MSM who, if the research I have quoted (still in moderation overnight) is replicated from the US to here, vote 93 to Labor for only 3 to Liberal/National, cannot understand Abbott’s popularity. They’ll have to think of a nastier way to defeat him.
That should read “93 to Labor for only 7 …”
I am not worried, Colin, about the government and its treatment by the MSM who, by the way, I agree with you that it’s the job of the MSM to bring a government to account, but I do not agree with you in that the MSM “have pilloried Abbott at every turn”, and I would dearly love for you to present evidence of the almost numberless instances of “every turn” to which you refer. The MSM has not been neutral in its reports or opinions on Gillard and Abbott.
Yes, the government is the side with power but the MSM, who also has power, has been so hypocritical and irresponsible in that it fails to look at itself in the mirror for then it would only see the truth in that its actions deserve contempt because it has been printing undeserved tendentious articles, ad nauseum, of the government with a not-so-clever attempt to make them appear as factual and nonaligned. You say “I want the power to vote as soon as possible”. If an election has to be held every time someone, such as yourself, wants one then there would have to be an election every ten minutes, because as you say “there are millions of us. Then you say “we live in a democracy”, but it’s not not your type of democracy because it prevents you from voting at your whim.
Colin,
Ah…, so the Australia that you live in is called the US?
Interesting!
By the way Abbot has his chance to form government, but after extensive talks with the same independents as Gillard, they concluded that he could not be trusted to stick to any deals, and would look for the trigger for a double dissolution ASAP.
This would not be good for the economy, as elections are very expensive, not to mention very annoying. He has also stated recently that when he does win, if he cannot implement his plans, whatever they are, he will call another election to gain control of the senate so that he can do what he wants.
Also on the MSM bias, I did not read or hear one headline that said that Gillard withdrew her support for the “Pokies” Reform because it was legislation that could not pass through parliament, but I heard and saw plenty that said “Another Gillard lie”, “or “Gillard back flips on pokies reform” etc etc.
Very balanced!
I think you miss my main point, higgs boson. I can’t demand an election and I’m perfectly happy to allow normal constitutional arrangements to apply. I can make my opinion known. But I do see the government being afraid of an election, particularly a by-election. Craig Thomson would have been dumped and expelled from the ALP ages ago under any normal circumstances. His expenses would not have been paid and he would probably be bankrupt now because of his own behaviour, and as a result, he would be ineligible to sit.
So I see lots of people with the “desire for power”. Gillard tops the list. And most disgracefully of all, she maintains it by supporting an allegedly fraudulent former union official. If he goes, her whole pack of cards collapses. Abbott, on the other hand, has a legitimate desire for power. That’s his job. And we the public, can only give it to him at an election. The polls tell us how we feel about that and you would be well aware of them.
My point on this article is about “a balanced media”. I agree with you that the media is not balanced. My view seems at odd with yours as I say the media is biased towards the left. I cited some articles to back up my assertions but they are still in moderation. One in particular is a review of a book. The book is Left Turn: How Liberal Media Distorts the American Mind and is by Tim Groseclose who holds a joint appointment in the departments of economics and political science at UCLA. Google it. I believe it is relevant to Australian media bias as well.
My other reference was to Possum on Crikey whose statistics showed the same thing. Google that too.
Colin.
Abbot, was, is and always will be a political thug, who gained the leadership by one vote after rolling Turnbull so that he could renege on a good faith deal done between the ALP and the LNP.
If that make his claim for power at any cost more legitimate, the honour respect and fair play are dead and buried in this country.
I do not agree with most of what you say, and make light of your opinions, but would fight for your right to express your views as that is one of the foundations of democracy.
I think the Australian mass media – from what I’ve seen – has been generally unfavourable to the Gillard Government and overly generous to Abbott and the Opposition since the last election.
I live in a remote area and my main sources of ‘news’ are (1) the internet and (2) TV. Certainly Skynews is very biased to the Coalition – and what I see of the Murdoch-dominated print media (viewed online) evinces a similar bias.
However, I accept that it is at least arguable that there’s a systemic bias to right-wing politics throughout the entire media. ALP, Coalition & Greens policies and perspectives receive some coverage and are given a voice to some extent. Detailed quantitative analysis of the kind that used to be carried out by the Glasgow Media Group in the UK would be needed to ‘prove’ such bias. Is anyone in Australia doing this work? There’s a big need for it.
Cases such as the Peter Slipper and Craig Thomson affairs are a quite different matter. On these specific issue the media does seem to operate with a group mind, develop a ‘consensus’ view – then dig in any refuse to cover alternative perspectives however well-documented and well-founded.
Because both of these cases play into party politics there is – as long as these cases drag on and are reported in such an unbalanced way – a clear pro-Coalition bias.
The Australian mass media’s bias is even worse on overseas issues where ‘Western media’ as a whole have already made up their minds. For instance, coverage of Libya last year – and of the ongoing attack on Syria – is extremely one-sided. We simply do not hear the alternative perspective – except in comments from the public where allowed.
The same applies to cases such as 9/11. A dazzling array of eminent people – including leading scientists, engineers, architects and other academics – have gone public with their doubts over the official narrative of 9/11. That event is of ongoing ‘mythic’ importance: it’s still used to rationalise the war in Afghanistan, military bloat, frightening expansion in the “secret state” and accompanying loss of civil liberties. Most of the general public is simply unaware of the weight of informed opinion that 9/11 was NOT the work of “Islamic extremists” – because our mainstream media refuses to report the subject with even a modicum of balance.
This is a most serious to our democracy and freedom. It is, of course, reminiscent of the type of dystopia which Eric Blair wrote about in 1984 – a book based to a significant extent on his experience working for the BCC during World War Two.
Our media is now in permanent ‘war mode’. Truth will remain a casualty as long as that continues – because the permanent war mentality is based on the incessant repetition of falsehoods.
It seems to me that Abbott’s style of politics would have been more at home in the ancient Roman senate! He is a brutish man and they fared very well in the Roman republic.
As for the Government… remind me again Colin… how many bills has this minority government been able to usher through parliament? And you say they are not performing… utter rubbish!
but the media don’t dispense “justice”. Funny Colin, thats exactly what Abbott and his slimy attack dogs have been trying to get them to do in the case of Thomson, very successfully I might add.
[...] On political journalists: [...]
[...] Allen, D. (2012). Australia deserves a balanced media. Independent Australia. from http://www.independentaustralia.net/2012/business/media-2/australia-deserves-a-balanced-media/ [...]