Queen Elizabeth II is 85 today — 21 April 2011. It has always seemed absurd that Australians acknowledge the birthday of Queen Elizabeth II at a completely different time to her actual birthday. Certainly a long weekend in June is a great way to start the winter snow season. Glenn Davies asks when Queen Elizabeth II will be allowed to put up her feet.
Queen Elizabeth will turn 85 eight days before the Royal wedding. If her birthday had fallen on a friday this year there’s a pretty good bet William and Kate would have tied the knot on Granny’s birthday. Most 85 years olds are long retired, but not that trouper the Queen. My grandmother will be 85 later this year. She’s a hardy soul but there’s no way she would be up to the frantic pace needed to be a world leader! But poor Queen Elizabeth II just keeps working. When do you think she will be allowed to retire? Most people these days retire by 60, judges are forced to retire at 70, but Queen Elizabeth II, at nearly 85 keeps on working.
On Queen Elizabeth’s 80th birthday, after midnight in the heart of London, the first rehearsals were held for her funeral. As happened for her mother when she reached about that age, a mock funeral march was staged. They’ll do it every year. In the case of the Queen Mother, they’d had lots of practice by the time she died at 101.
On 13 April 2011, the Queen was forced to miss a key public engagement for the first time in five years. She was due to attend a service of the Royal Victorian Order with other senior members of the royal family at Windsor but pulled out at the last moment with a heavy nosebleed. She recovered enough to attend a reception in the state apartments of the castle afterwards but royal sources expressed concern at her sudden attack of ill-health. Up to 1200 people attend the event, held every four years for those who have been honoured by the Queen for their dedicated personal service, making it the most significant engagement she has cancelled since 2006.
In October 2006 the Queen had to scrap a day at the races because of a strained muscle in her back. When Rolf Harris went to accept his CBE at Windsor Palace, he received his gong for services to art and entertainment instead from Princess Anne. Also, the Queen had to pull out of opening the new Emirates stadium of English Premiership football club Arsenal in north London because of her back injury. This time her 85 year-old husband Philip deputised—can you think of any 85 year old men who are still working?
It is highly unusual for the stoical monarch to slow down on her schedule or withdraw from events. The Queen carries out hundreds of engagements a year alongside her official duties. In 2005, she carried out 378 engagements compared with 509 in 1996. Early in October 2006 she was in Belfast to review British soldiers stationed in Northern Ireland, despite suffering from a bloodshot eye.
Queen Elizabeth II came to the throne in 1952 and it was not until July 1982 that she was first admitted to hospital—to have a wisdom tooth removed. She was forced to cancel several engagements in 1993 because of the flu, while in 1994 she broke her wrist when her horse tripped during a ride on her Sandringham county estate in eastern England. In 2005, she cancelled three engagements because of a cold and sore throat, while in 2003 she had keyhole surgery after suffering a torn cartilage walking on rough ground. That led to a reduced schedule as she convalesced from the successful 45-minute operation. Further surgery on her left knee later the same year was combined with a procedure to remove minor growths from her face.
Her diary is full to capacity for the rest of the year including the imminent royal wedding, a state visit to Ireland next month and the visit to Britain by President Barack Obama. She is due to attend the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Perth in the southern hemisphere spring and will celebrate her diamond jubilee in 2012.
But if it’s the Queen’s birthday on 21 April then why do we have a public holiday to celebrate it in June each year? The idea of celebrating the sovereign’s birthday was introduced in 1905. After Queen Victoria’s death in 1901 there was a call to remember her long reign. The result was the creation of Empire Day. On 24 May each year, Victoria’s birthday, an annual commemoration was held which was directed especially at school children to promote loyalty among the dominion countries of the British Empire. This day was celebrated by lighting fire-works in back-gardens and attending community bonfires. In 1958, Empire Day was renamed Commonwealth Day. However, this is no longer celebrated within the Australian community. Instead Queensland has gazetted the official Queen’s birthday to be on the second Monday in June.
Perhaps celebrating the birthday of one of the fathers of federation such as Henry Parkes may be more relevant to Australians than either Queen’s Victoria or Elizabeth’s. Coincidentally, Parkes was born on 27 May 1815, almost three years earlier, to the day, than Queen Victoria. Federation Day sounds better than Empire Day, and it could still be held each year on the second Monday in June!
There’s no doubt Queen Elizabeth II is a sturdy trooper. But when will she be given a retirement watch from The Firm and be allowed to sleep in, watch Oprah or potter around in the garden. To make her keep working after 85 seems cruel and unusual punishment.
Happy birthday Queen Elizabeth II — and three cheers to the coming republic.









13 Comments
RT @AusRepublic: Queen Elizabeth is 86 today. How many 86 year-olds are forced to keep working? http://fb.me/10IjJ2bLt
RT @AusRepublic: Queen Elizabeth is 86 today. How many 86 year-olds are forced to keep working? http://fb.me/10IjJ2bLt
If we all had a republic, she would have been able to retire years ago as a president would only serve a certain term. As a life-long republican, I have pointed out many times that, instead of being anti-royaol, as our detractors would suggests, we are in fact pro-royals as we would would free them to live a normal life. Join Republic – see our facebook page.
Was Jesus Christ born on 25th December?
“But when will she be given a retirement watch from The Firm and be allowed to sleep in”?
Well, SHE IS THE FIRM. So she can retire when she wants. She chooses to do the duty she promised many years ago and will continue to do so for many years to come.
By all means prompt her to go, but there’s heirs and spares to burn and rarin’ to go. Republicans really need a better reason to sneer than the Queen’s age and selfless dedication to lifetime service to her subjects. Note, she serves her subjects by doing her work … self funded and unpaid by the taxpayer.
P.S. Do your research, Glenn. We (states) don’t all celebrate her birtday in June.
Heirs to burn, eh’ Captain Sneer? About all they’re good for.
Dear Mr. Davies,
Your energies in critisizing Her Majesty the Queen are mis-spent.
I was born and raised in the Republic of California within the macro republic of The United States Of America;our Royalty are Hollywood stars, dynasties of Kennedys and Bushes ,girls being crowned Miss America ,men parading around as Knights of Columbus, T.V. shows like, ” Queen For A Day” and self ordained saints like Oprah.
The Queen is the legitimate heir of a real dynasty born to rule by Divine Right.She is a servant to her people and a stabilizing influence in a frenetic world. Unlike her spineless Uncle Edward The Eighth who abandoned his people to marry his American “Dream Girl”
Hey look, here we have another monarchist who loves to say Sneer. It must be a trait among lovers of royalty that they accuse anyone who challenges their world view as “sneering”.
Thomas D’arcy, I dub thee Sergeant Sneer.
Born to rule by “Divine Right”. What’s it like back in the 16th century, Robert? Mwah hahahahahahahahahahaha.
Goose.
There is no Divine Right to anything.
They were just the most agressive and warlike poeple, they invaded territories, massacred woman and children, stole the local peoples resources, and are still living off the profits of their plunder.
Their “self funded” philanthropy was funded by the death of millions of slaves of the British Empire.
They should be tried for profiting from War crimes.
“The Queen is the legitimate heir of a real dynasty born to rule by Divine Right.She is a servant to her people and a stabilizing influence in a frenetic world”.
The Prince of Liechenstein conceded divine right is non-sense and said the major issue with the US Constitution is that it has no room for direct democracy on a federal level, unlike another “stabilizing influence in a frenetic world”: the Republic of Switzerland. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AXBX3e1T64
Americans like achivements and self-made people. It may be they are more worth worshipping than a genetic lottery that is the Queen.
@BKP,
The the royal family didnt make millions going from the colonys, it was everyday subjects who made the money. Please provide references to prove your point.
Since when has the ‘Queen’ “served her public” What an absurd statement. She has served no-one but herself ensuring that her own family are well and truly looked after and like her never have to work.
Anyone can carry on until they are 85, having led a very priviliged and pampered life, with absolutely no work to carry out, other than shaking hands with other people and opening buildings.
Remember, she has never had to budget her finances, look after a family – others have done this – whilst holding down a proper job. Her attitude to life has generated throughout her family, whom all believe in a sense of entitlement.
So, Gloria Flynn, the Queen has “never had to work”? She has, “absolutely no work to carry out, other than shaking hands with other people and opening buildings.” Oddly enough, I disagree.
If this is so, what would a President of Australia do? Granted he/she will shake hands and open buildings. But what else would we be paying for with us having to support two official houses, staff, security, travel, protocol and everything else.
Perhaps you should dig a little deeper on the Queen’s actual duties (ie WORK) which are much the same as our GG and prospective president.
To Robert Bentley “The Queen is the legitimate heir of a real dynasty born to rule by Divine Right.She is a servant to her people and a stabilizing influence in a frenetic world”?????
You are joking,I hope? The Divine Right of Kings went out with Louis X1V of France, and remember how he ended up. No sensible person will agree with you on this and many may wonder if you are little ‘disturbed’ to be honest. No, the queen has done her duty over many years and even I, a republican, admit she has done it as well as she could according to her own ideals. Many of us work hard, of course, so that alone does not fit her to be Head of State. Much better to let people of out-standing merit, achievement, talent, intellect and great personal qualities apply for the job and for the public to elect one. If you adree, join Republic on facebook.