This story, by Independent Australia editor David Donovan, was published today in Crikey. The following is the text in full:
Yesterday, Julia Gillard declared her republican aspirations for Australia, saying that Australia should be a republic after the end of the Queen’s reign.
Meanwhile, the Liberal Party under Tony Abbott appears to have quietly thrown its support behind the monarchy according to a letter published on a monarchist website said to be from the Liberals federal campaign director, Brian Loughnane.
The text of the letter, published on the official ‘Australians for Constitutional Monarchy’ Facebook page, states that the Liberal Party supports the continued role of the monarchy in Australia’s system.
The first two sentences of the letter are as follows:
“We support the role of the Crown in Australia’s constitutional system. The Coalition has no plans to make any changes to Australia’s existing constitutional framework.”
This varies sharply with stated Liberal Party policy not to have a policy on an Australian republic.
This position was enunciated by Tony Abbott on the ABC’s Q and A programme last month.
“If it ever came to a vote, the Liberal Party policy is for each member to have a conscience vote on the floor of Parliament,” said Mr Abbott.
Repeated requests for confirmation about the veracity of the letter and any change in Liberal Pary policy have so far been stonewalled, officials saying that the letter had been “referred” to Mr Loughnane’s media advisor who would be “in touch”.
Tony Abbott is an ardent monarchist and was once the executive director of the same group that published the letter: Australians for Constitutional Monarchy.
In a TV interview with Andrew Denton, former Liberal Party leader John Hewson related how Mr Abbott had once told him that Australia would become a republic over his [Abbott’s] dead body.
Mr Abbott appeared to echo this statement at the National Press Club yesterday, when he said: “I am far from certain that, at least in our lifetimes, there’s likely to be any significant change.”
The Liberals are deeply split on the issue of the republic between moderate republicans and more conservative monarchists.
Indeed, Tony Abbott won the Liberal leadership by just one vote from the ex-chair of the Australian Republican Movement, Malcolm Turnbull.
Republicans now hold key positions in the Liberals leadership team, including Joe Hockey (Treasury), Andrew Robb (Finance) and Julie Bishop (Foreign Affairs).
The question is whether Tony Abbott and his campaign team have quietly moved the Liberal Party to a pro-monarchist position without discussion in the party room.
If so, it sets the stage for further disssension within the Liberal Party and a potential wedge by the Labor Party after the election.








8 Comments
I’m not sure if I should look at this as a good or bad thing, I try to do something.. “good” and post the letter on the ACM facebook page that i was sent by the Australian Monarchist league to its members/subscribers and now I have my own article… this is not what i had in mind at all
still I agree with the Article, in the sense that if the Libs really mean to support the crown they need to be open and honest about it, it’s too easy for them to back out of it if they only privately say they support the crown but publicly they aren’t bothered either way
It’s what make and break votes, just like in this election
Telling the truth is never a bad thing Joshua.
Well yes, but I don’t see how it’s that big of a deal, I mean this isn’t really news to me
The liberals have always been for the Monarchy and Labour has always been for a republic because they support the working class commons
I’m confused at how this is BIG new or how this is somehow a dirty letter that shouldn’t be spoken about
it was sent to the world via PM to the group members and I just went and posted it on the ACM facebook page to keep them up to date, since not all the members over on the ACM bored aren’t member of the league, I thought they would want to know
why a news reporter from the Australian wanted to write an artical on the letter beats me, it’s not truely news worthy
Yes I have to agree with that, plus there was that Journalist from “the Australian” that somehow found my privet email address without asking me
I have no problem that she emailed me asking for the letter, I willingly gave it to her, but I wish she had of asked for my email address first and not just gown ahead and just taken it,
or at least made it clear where she got it from, since i don’t hand out my email address all willy nilly to just ANYONE
but from what i can gather, she read this article I wrote on I.A where i mentioned the letter, somehow got my email address and then searched it on facebook perhaps…. I really can’t understand how she worked it
Either that or she saw the post I made on facebook, and wanted the letter
But it doesn’t explain how the woman from “The Australian” got my email address or wrote to David Donavon
Wrong, Joshua, lots of Liberals support a republic and I think the article explains why it is newsworthy pretty well. The Liberals have a public policy of being neutral on a republic since it is a divisive in their party . Abbott was elected by just1 vote with he support of moderates. There is a rift between wets and dries in the Liberal Party and the point is whether Abbott is going out and making policy without consulting the party room and sneakily making the Liberals a monarchist prty without telling ardent republicans in its ranks.
Or, on the other hand, is it lying to the Monarchist Lague and it doesn’t frmally support the monarchy but is just trying to get their votes. Whatever, Brian Loughnane will probably not be pleased that this has become public since it puts into question what else Abbott isn’t telling us. Is there secret plans to bring back Workchoices, for example. This is less about the republic and more about internal divisions if the Liberal Party and whether Abbott is going to be a consultative leader. Rudd lost his job for not consulting cabinet when he made decisions.
ok well let’s keep off the republic for a second and talk about this from a political point of view
Positions always have secrets about everything, not just Abbott, Ms Gillard most likely has secrets that we won’t find out about till it’s too late
Time changes everyone’s intentions.
Rudd was sacked because he wasn’t falling in the polls and Labour wanted to win the next election, they were cruel in what they did, I voted for John Howard in the last election, I always wanted Kevin Rudd out of office because of his republican views
but even i was against what labour did to the poor guy
whether or not they are just looking for the Monarchist vote I don’t know, I would hope not but, who knows.
But if Brian Loughnane sent the letter like the league says, why would the party room not know? Abbott can’t just tell this brian guy to send out emails that flat out lie, and even if Abbot WAS doing stuff secretly, Brian Loughnane wouldn’t do things without the rest of the party knowing would he?
I spoke to several senior Liberals and none of them knew anything about this letter or the apparent change in policy, so it seems it is something that was done by the campaign team led by Brian Loughnane presumably at the behest of the leader without notifying the other members of the Party. If that wasn’t the case all Brian Loughnane needs to do is get back to me and correct the record. He hasn’t done that.
hmmm… I don’t like the sound of that…. well it’s eather going to turn out to be a fraud and will make the monarchests very upser
or it’s real and we won’t find out untill saturday, after the election…
eather way, if you could keep us informed on what happens, I would be rather interested , as I said before this kind of thing will lose votes or make them if it’s true
I myself was willing to vote liberals because of this letter, it doesn’t realy mattter now if it’s a fraud though,
politicly though I’m pretty sure Gillard will win, everyone I know is voteing for Gillard, not for the republic vote, but becasue of the bradband network thing… everyone seems so excitered that Australia will have a 100MB a second internet
where’s Abbotts was like 12MB a second wasn’t it? heh